IU Scott

You don't think we had part of getting embarrassed

Watching a lot of other teams and no other team runs an offense like our offense. Woodson has to have some humility and realize you can't run an offense through the post let alone two post men. Our guard play is brutal and no guard worth anything would want to play in this offense. We never get shooters an open look from the offense but it has to come from a kick out from the big's. Absolutely no player movement or off the ball screens. Woodson needs to watch Nebraska's offense to see what a college offense is supposed to look like. Hoiberg spent a lot of time in the NBA before getting his first college job but he actually knows what a modern offense is supposed to look like Coach Knight wouldn't believe one of his former players would run an offense like this.

Another time when benching a player with two fouls killed us. Even though Reneau wasn't playing great it was still close until we took him out with his 2nd foul. Took Johnson out as well so what was he saving them for

You can tell which team is the well coach team. They move players and the ball and no standing around. We stand around trying to throw into the post and can't figure out why we can't get the ball inside. You can't just post your bigs without any cutting or screening. We are just do easy to guard. It seems like the only time we actually run anything is on an in bound play. This is the lowest basketball IQ team I have ever seen.

No surprise, these top coaches loves when top jobs come open. It gives them the opportunity to get a huge raise from their current team.

I am sorry but I don't play for that team , not there is anything wrong with thatLOL!

Belmont produces good smart and sound players. They produced a first round draft pick last year in Ben Shepard. He has had some good moments for the Pacers this year.

The thing about using scoring margins as one of the metrics is you don't always no the circumstances. Team A is winning by 30 with 7 minutes to go and takes all of their starters out. They want to give their young players some work against a bad non conference opponent. Team A only wins by 14. Team B playing the same bad non conference team but keeps their starters in until the end and wins by 40. So Team B gets credit for running up the score against an inferior team and Team A gets marked off for calling off the dogs. All this will lead to is coaches running up scores instead of trying to develop your players and helping your team in the long run

You would probably love BTB because some of them are still delusional thinking we will still make a change. There Fire Mike Woodson thread is up to 790 pages the last time I checked. I still lurk but stopped posting there because it is getting as bad as Peeg's got.

Or that they actually call fouls that Edey commits

Preach it brother. These kinds of things is just making sports less enjoyable. Sports are for entertainment but everyone now has to have every little thing dissected to 1 one millionth. I enjoyed selection Sunday so much more when you were surprised when the selections were revealed. Now every outlet starts their bracketology the day after the season ends.

Yet they probably be a 4 or 5 seed

I guess I will give it a little longer but it looks like once again Ballard is being to passive when it comes to free agency. To me signing your own is good if your team is a playoff team but when you are average at best you are just bring back players who finished .500. It is obvious this philosophy hasn't worked but he is unwilling to change it. This is one thing I don't understand about coaches and GM's is their stubbornness to change what isn't working. The best in the business is able to adapt and change when needed.

In my opinion I think the key to the game is to score more points than Nebraska. If this happens then I think we have a good shot to win.

Is this t true that Auburn has not had 1 quad 1 win all year. I heard someone say that but I found that hard to believe.

The year after UVA lost to a 16 seed, they were a #1 again. They were behind at the half to a 16 seed

It is a shame that the outcome on the court has no bearing on the rating.

My ex wife lives there and her church got destroyed in the storm. There were 3 people trapped in the church

Well if we want to determine everything by computers why play the games, just do simulations to determine the winners. I take the eye test over these stupid rankings any day. The team that will be hurt the most is ISU because a computer thinks a 18-14 power conference team deserves a bid over a 28-5 team.

Don't you love computer geeks getting to determine who the best teams are. They never played the game yet they pick and choose what criteria to put into the formulas to get the rankings. I just don't get a ranking based on scoring margins because I that is about the only difference between us and MSU

I am going in the theory of we have to run it to get in so I want the easiest path to the championship

You mean against OSU

Great win

Fouling up 3 with 5 seconds to go came back to haunt them last night

Everything depends if Galloway can play effectively if at all.