Jump to content

IU Scott

Members
  • Posts

    35,167
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    57

Posts posted by IU Scott

  1. 1 hour ago, FKIM01 said:

    Back at the subject, Goode would slot nicely into the current roster.  Would be tough for me seeing him play the 4 unless you're temporarily going small.  Looks like a natural 3 to me.  I don't remember Miller Kopp being a real effective 4 in IU's system.

    I hate the idea of waiting a whole week to resolve this one, but I guess there are enough open spots to give him a week.  Just seems silly when he likely already knows.

    I can see a rotation where Goode comes in for Reneau and we move MM to the 4 with Ballo. Later Reneau comes in for Ballo so you can have 4 guys rotating for 3 spots

  2. Just now, iuswingman said:

    Do you have a link to those stats one percentage of schools that don't use all 13 scholarships?  I would have guessed most schools use all of them.  

    I don't recall very many years where IU went through a season with an open scholarship but don't follow other schools to know if that's normal.

    I heard  people talking about coach K didn't use all 13 scholarships 

  3. 5 minutes ago, 13th&Jackson said:

    It was the circumstances. IU had insufficient guard depth and experience in 22/23 when XJ got injured. They had even less last season when he was injured again. Filling the 13th scholarship doesn't necessarily mean it's the last guy off the bench.

    I know but if we get Goode and another big it wouldn't be the end of the world not using the last scholarship. If your 10-12 players are Cupps, Newton and Leal your roster is pretty good. It is going to get harder to fill all of your spots because players aren't transferring to sit the bench

    • Like 2
  4. 6 minutes ago, iuswingman said:

    So is Goode a higher priority over Anderson?

    Goode: 5.7 PPG, 3.6 RPG, 0.6 APG, 39.7 FG%, 38.9 3FG%

    Anderson: 12.8 PPG, 5.1 RPG, 1.9 APG, 48.2 FG%, 45.9 3FG%

    Of course, Goode is playing against tougher competition, at least in conference.  

    Take it for what it is worth but on the other site Chris said that Anderson is looking for more playing time than IU can offer

    • Thanks 1
  5. 21 minutes ago, Parakeet Jones said:

    I don’t think they can afford to lose game two though. 

    They have to win the next game. Also looking forward we still need a starting 2 and 3. I just don't think Neimhard should be a starting 2 on a playoff team

  6. 2 hours ago, Kdug said:

    Can someone explain Carlyle’s numbers from last year? Looking at them, they look pretty subpar. 32% from 3, 54% at the rim, 40% from mid range. More TOs per game than assists.

    Was he just asked to do too much, not put in the best position, injury, all of the above? He seems to be pretty universally considered a top transfer, so I’m guessing there’s some explanation. Just trying to understand what his game will look like with the starting 5 we have next year.

    I think they had him play with the ball in his hands to much. His catch and shoot percentage was really good. Also he shot 36% from 3 in conference play so he did improve that.

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...