Jump to content

IUCrazy2

Members
  • Posts

    3,891
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by IUCrazy2

  1. Everyone on these forums uses some hyperbole. Everyone. For the rest, I think the rumors are more just confirmation of what I myself am observing from the outside looking in. None of that is gospel. I don't think he is going to be successful because he doesn't appear to want to do the things required to be successful at this level. This isn't the NBA and what he is doing isn't going to work. But hey, I am mad about that as opposed to just throwing my hands up and saying whatever. I still think there might be a chance to see him pushed out and avoid next year if enough people stay pissed. If he is back, I will take a big step back from the program and give the more positive and forgiving crowd what they want. And that step back will be from IU athletics as a whole, which stinks because I am bought in on Cignetti at the moment but I won't give a dime or my time to IU if they keep Woodson another year. I will probably come back and hope for the best from whomever they replace him with. College basketball is my favorite sport, I am tired of having it be something that I do out of habit as opposed to it being fun. I blame IU for the not being fun part and I blame my stupidity for letting it be a habit to spend time on something that I can tell you is likely to not be much fun next year.
  2. What did I say that was not factual? We have these arguments too often though because our AD keeps making stupid hires. This gets as tiresome for us as it does for you. This sucks. The vast majority of springs the past 20 years we have spent on the outside looking in. That has been even more so the xase in the last decade. Woodson has done some alright things, every coach can say that. So what? We are just going to end up antagonizing each other, you guys do this every time it becomes clear a dude needs to go. I am not interested in getting pedantic with you. The overall analysis on Woodson's tenure and his likely future should he be retained another year isn't good. I don't care that he helped a couple guys get in the NBA. I care he isn't helping us get wins now and his approach to roster building is going to take a miracle not yet pulled off in the portal era to have a product worth watching next year. So I am not inclined to give a sh** about whatever small amount of credit he may deserve. In the scheme of things it doesn't matter.
  3. To each their own. The fanbase needs fans like you just like we need the pitchfork crowd. Keeps everyone honest. Unfortunately we are in the position where the pitchfork crowd needs to be at the forefront. If Woodson was even doing half his job you could maybe defend him for this year but he isn't, so I won't. He needs to go.
  4. I am sure he did help him out with some stuff. Woodson has been around the NBA so he has some knowledge of tweaking this or that for a player. That being said, the guys he really "improved" were all thought to be pretty darn good to begin with. JHS came in expected to be one and done. His trajectory was nowhere close to that until a key injury forced the issue on where/how he was used. TJD I think he helped round him out. Ware got some help with his motor but his skill set was always there. I think there has been some improvement on his motor. That is especially true of late, but he is gearing up for the NBA so he has that extra incentive. All that being said. The philosophical approach Woodson has to the on court product doesn't match modern basketball. He sucks at roster construction. He is bullheaded to a fault. He is lazy (too much smoke around that fire, so it is above rumor status at this point). At the end of the day, damn him with faint praise, I am fine with that. The totality of the situation is still that he overall sucks and needs fired. I am fine with people piling on a little hyperbole if that is what it takes to get the decision makers to hasten his departure. Woodson belongs on a golf course smoking a cigar. He likes having the title of IU coach but he doesn't like the job. He should be forced into retirement or fired in time to announce it on the Selection Sunday show.
  5. Yes I have said that but I think a bunch of people have. When you line up the advantages of Indiana that are discussed whenever that job opens up, the only advantage I can think of that isn't related to fan support is the fact that Indiana churns out quite a bit of D1 talent (as does the immediate area) for a coach to mine. Almost everything else of any consequence is the fans. Their actual support, NIL, financial backing of the program itself, media presence which helps boost NIL, program getting on TV in big games....you can go down the line and the only reason Indiana isn't getting treated like Minnesota is fan support. We would rarely sniff a national game if our fan support matched our record the past 2 decades. I stopped watching Archie's last year. You find there are other things to do with the 4 to 6 hours a week. I am prepared to do that again if they keep Woodson. Although I will probably extend that to the football team if he sticks around too. I have attended some games on that side the past few years but I am tired of supporting an AD that doesn't treat its fans well.
  6. If Woodson is here next year I pray that this program gets the support they deserve so it looks more like what they supposedly want. Take the percentage of fans in the stands at Memorial Stadium on Saturdays and the activity you see discussing IU football and give them a year of that positive but minimal support in basketball. Most of the team is going to be a bunch of paid mercenaries who I have zero attachment to, the staff sucks, and the administration is full of incompetent finger pointers who abuse their customers. I hope Assembly Hall looks like Maryland's home court advantage this past year and everybody can get what they want.
  7. Yeah, but that doesn't stop those same kids from going places like Kentucky. The ONLY thing that keeps us in these conversations is the fans. Period. This program has been mostly a disaster for 23 years that is still viewed as "royalty" (although damaged) based solely on the support of people who keep going because of our memories of what it used to be. Everything that everyone talks about as being an advantage of Indiana is almost entirely the fanbase. When we play like sh**, people complain we are playing like sh**. That is true of every fanbase that gives a damn about the team they are following. You know whose fans are really quiet? Basketball teams like Penn State where next to no one gives a rats @$$ because it isn't football. The fans aren't the problem. Mike Woodson's entitled, arrogant, lazy approach to his job is the problem. Forgive fans for noticing they are getting fleeced. All that being said, I agree with your last point. Don't boo, just don't show up. I get so ------- tired of the "fan's hurt the program" argument every time the administration screws up. I wish people would just disappear if this sh** show is put on again next year. Enjoy your 5,000 positive fans at Assembly Hall and nobody on Twitter noticing you suck and see how easy it is to pull people to come play at Indiana.
  8. If Leary wasn't trying to make a buck with his shooting school he would be one of the most negative about everything going on. Based on what is coming out, Woodson is a lazy, arrogant, joke of a basketball coach who has no business anywhere but a golf course enjoying retirement. Get him the ---- out of here.
  9. Too bad that only happens once every 4 or 5 games.
  10. Knecht never visited. They didn't name names. People ran with Love as that one fell apart right after he left campus (which would match the story).
  11. The most important part of that starts around the 15:30 mark. I don't know how you invite someone to your program and don't even bother to learn their name.
  12. I could see doing that in a case where you have a guy who is pretty good at those things and puts in the work but you are wanting to supplement that to try and get a leg up. That kind of GM role? Sign me up. This appears to be more of a case of the guy we hired isn't competent at doing his core job so we need to hire more people just to bring him up to speed with every other coach in P5. And you know, if you had a guy who was an X's and O's genius who just needed help getting the Jims and Joes, you could almost live with that. The problem is that we are getting neither.
  13. I just don't like any of them. His whole recruitment here was a troll job. I would take the rest of their class but that kid can get bent.
  14. And the thing is, they knew that. That is why they forced Matta (in particular) and Fife on him. They knew, they just did not care.
  15. I would rather watch it burn than have to root for a member of the Harper family.
  16. It is laziness. Woodson is f---ing lazy. That is why you hear rumblings of a GM or building rosters through the portal every year. He was used to the NBA lifestyle and he likes the trappings that come with being the head coach at Indiana but he doesn't want to do the work. He needs to just retire so he can do what he really wants to do. This is all a vanity project to feed his ego. He wanted this a decade ago and got rejected so now it is just a status thing for him.
  17. And a GM to continue to explain to him how college is different. Loading up on a bunch of portal players every year is not building a bridge or any kind of future. It is just temporary bandaid to cover up that Woodson is a mediocre coach overall who is maybe a step below even that when you add up all the things he didn't have to do in the NBA that he should be doing now.
  18. If you are going to be that way, you have to back it up. Woodson is all the arrogance with none of the results.
  19. I think the upset will wear off quickly. I am annoyed by the news at the moment, you know what I am not doing right now, having my full attention on the meaningless game going on in Minneapolis at the moment. That is what will be the outcome. Every year of crap ball means a few more people who wander away from the die hard fandom.
  20. I think the initial was a warning shot and Buckner doubled down and now it is all out. (Outside looking in, I have no inside info). This looks like office politics and people jockeying for the narrative. Rabjohns was the brush back pitch, the contract stuff and everyone unloading on Quinn is throwing at the head.
  21. I don't think he is being a yes man at the moment. There is very clearly a power struggle going on and Dolson/the AD opened fire last night by releasing the media and getting in front of the narrative. The leak of the contract change, everything Rabjohns posted, that is all coming from the AD. Dolson is playing politics right now and he has a bit of a propaganda leg up on Quinn in that his people are in contact with these recruiting sites and media members far more often than Quinn would be w.r.t. IU athletics. A yes man would be putting out stuff to support Woodson. It is clear that someone at Indiana (most likely Dolson's department) chose war.
  22. https://btownbanners.com/topic/14310-fire-coach-woodson/?do=findComment&comment=871956 Start there. About 3 pages from there is some info on what may have gone wrong with the Fland recruitment too.
×
×
  • Create New...