Jump to content

GrangerHoosier

Members
  • Posts

    231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

309 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Wonderful, another fan with a binary, archaic way of looking at things. No one is talking about dropping unmarked bags of cash off on a recruit's doorstep, or having someone take a college entrance exam for a recruit. I'm referring to finding ways to operate in a way that isn't outright cheating, but in an area the NCAA clearly doesn't care to police or even monitor. You know, what probably 90% of Power 5 schools are doing. Before you knock it and act all holier than thou, I can all but guarantee Mike Woodson wants to operate in this gray area too.
  2. SMH. Yeah the only reasonable explanation for someone not totally on board with this hire is that they're a hater.
  3. Come on, there is no way you can guarantee that so don't even bother. You sound a lot like Notre Dame fans talking about Charlie Weis when he was hired, how he was learning under some of the best minds in football and was going to out-scheme anyone they played. We all know how that turned out.
  4. What has he proven? His career winning % as a head coach is around 45%. He's never coached in college, nor recruited a college athlete. He hasn't been a head coach in 6 years. If he's so "proven" as you suggest, how come no one else hired him to be their head coach since the Knicks hired someone to replace him? Sorry, but just because this is someone's dream job doesn't make them uniquely qualified for it. Nor does it ensure success. It sounds like he'll have support from the administration, but where he could use real support is if they backed off a little and let him and his staff work the gray area in recruiting. To me, if we're still not willing to go there then it won't matter very much who the coach is.
  5. You mad bro? Calm down, it's called an analogy. After going for the hire everyone wants in Brad Stevens, Dolson went right for the safest, surest thing he could find without going after some other options first like Chris Beard, Musselman, Oats, etc. I'll support the guy, but I'm also really trying to get excited about it.
  6. Maybe we could get Keion Brooks to transfer from UK. He might benefit from a fresh start as much as we would.
  7. Scott Dolson was at the bar, went right for the hottest girl there, got rejected then went straight for the drunk fat chick.
  8. As opposed to Jaden Iveys step back 3 against OSU? Oh that was different.
  9. I kind of agree. A shortened shot clock means there is less time to run a good play or get into your offensive set, so teams will start jacking more 3s than they already do.
  10. That is one rule I hope never makes it to college basketball, along with the 24 second shot clock. It just doesn't make any sense at all.
  11. Could not care less. I had a sibling go to school with him, and know a few people who used to play with him. He is not a nice guy.
  12. Ivey is a huge piece of crap. Not a fan of his, was a little uneasy when we briefly recruited him but relieved that was short lived.
  13. We were recruiting him at one point, I believe mentioned in his top 10 at least. He's originally from Pennsylvania, so perhaps Archie has a connection there. He's still not in the transfer portal, but Huggins did say he won't be back this season. So maybe transferring is inevitable.
  14. I wonder what happened to him. Maybe he just needs a change of scenery. If he hasn't lost his passion, this would be a huge pickup for us. Maybe we'll make an inquiry here.
  15. Yeah I probably won't watch us play Iowa. I get the feeling we'll be playing well and leading going into the final minute, then Bohannon will hit three contested 3's late to win it. My wife still remembers the time a water bottle got thrown across our living room in frustration when he last played against us in Iowa City.
×
×
  • Create New...