CauseThatsMyDJ Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 6 minutes ago, FKIM01 said: Come on, DJ...as an admin you know better than this. You want me to start on Obama and Hillary? Has nothing to do with politics. Donald Trump is an objectively terrible person toward women and misogynist and was long before he got involved in politics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FKIM01 Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 Well I disagree it's not politics but I guess that's just me. Bill Clinton wasn't exactly the gold standard in behavior toward the opposite sex either. I like a lot of your stuff...I really do, but it feels like we've strayed over a line here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CauseThatsMyDJ Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, FKIM01 said: Well I disagree it's not politics but I guess that's just me. Bill Clinton wasn't exactly the gold standard in behavior toward the opposite sex either. I like a lot of your stuff...I really do, but it feels like we've strayed over a line here. Why are you bringing up other politicians? Did Knight campaign for any of them? If he didn’t, they are irrelevant. The question is will he still support OSU, and his history shows that he will. The fact that the example used is a politician is incidental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoHoosier Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 1 minute ago, CauseThatsMyDJ said: Why are you bringing up other politicians? Did Knight campaign for any of them? If he didn’t, they are irrelevant. The question is will he still support OSU, and his history shows that he will. The fact that the example used is a politician is incidental. Does this connection get made if he wasn't our president and knowing your political leaning? I avoid posting political facts due to my perceived bent here, that, and my understanding (or misunderstanding) of the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CauseThatsMyDJ Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 Just now, PoHoosier said: Does this connection get made if he wasn't our president and knowing your political leaning? I avoid posting political facts due to my perceived bent here, that, and my understanding (or misunderstanding) of the rules. So if he ran for president and Knight endorsed him and he lost? Yes, it would. Again, this has nothing to do with politics. And has to do with the fact that Bob Knight supported someone that treats women like crap, and that shows that he will still support OSU. For the sake of argument, let’s say Obama, Hillary and Bill are all horrible toward women. Guess how that impacts this discussion? Zero because Knight never endorsed them. I can’t make it any more clear that Trump being a politician is incidental. This has nothing to do with his policies. But his character isn’t up for debate, it’s well documented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5fouls Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 Okay. Back on topic. Purdue Sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 2 hours ago, CauseThatsMyDJ said: So if he ran for president and Knight endorsed him and he lost? Yes, it would. Again, this has nothing to do with politics. And has to do with the fact that Bob Knight supported someone that treats women like crap, and that shows that he will still support OSU. For the sake of argument, let’s say Obama, Hillary and Bill are all horrible toward women. Guess how that impacts this discussion? Zero because Knight never endorsed them. I can’t make it any more clear that Trump being a politician is incidental. This has nothing to do with his policies. But his character isn’t up for debate, it’s well documented. Knight doesn't impact this discussion either, you made it political. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 1 hour ago, 5fouls said: Okay. Back on topic. Purdue Sucks. Evidently, most of the conference does? Just sayin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogue3542 Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 25 minutes ago, rico said: Knight doesn't impact this discussion either, you made it political. Trump had a long history of womanizing and misogyny before he entered politics. DJ was directly responding to a question by another poster regarding Knight's stance on the domestic violence situation at Ohio State. Knight's support of Trump, whose track record in this area speaks for itself in a completely apolitical manner, speaks directly to what we might expect out of Knight regarding his feelings toward Ohio State; namely that he would practice zero tolerance when it came to those over whom he had power but would look the other way when it came to those who are "on his team" so to speak. I understand, appreciate, and agree with the desire to keep political discussions off this board, particularly in our current political climate, but I think we should also be allowed to cite people and their character in an apolitical manner (regardless of that person's participation in a political organization or government) if it is germane to the discussion rather than pretending those issues don't have relevance to or impact on the topic at hand. That's a fine line, I know, but I think this board can handle it better than most. For me, the reference of Trump as a misogynist has nothing to do with politics, and it directly relates to the question of Knight's feelings toward Ohio State and its domestic violence situation as he was/is a vocal backer of Trump despite those character traits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btownqb Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 4 hours ago, CauseThatsMyDJ said: Has nothing to do with politics. Donald Trump is an objectively terrible person toward women and misogynist and was long before he got involved in politics. Why is this the discussion for this thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btownqb Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 Annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 10 minutes ago, btownqb said: Why is this the discussion for this thread? It isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btownqb Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, rico said: It isn't. I'm reading opinions on our president and idiotic ex coach instead of our conference in football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 19 minutes ago, rogue3542 said: Trump had a long history of womanizing and misogyny before he entered politics. DJ was directly responding to a question by another poster regarding Knight's stance on the domestic violence situation at Ohio State. Knight's support of Trump, whose track record in this area speaks for itself in a completely apolitical manner, speaks directly to what we might expect out of Knight regarding his feelings toward Ohio State; namely that he would practice zero tolerance when it came to those over whom he had power but would look the other way when it came to those who are "on his team" so to speak. I understand, appreciate, and agree with the desire to keep political discussions off this board, particularly in our current political climate, but I think we should also be allowed to cite people and their character in an apolitical manner (regardless of that person's participation in a political organization or government) if it is germane to the discussion rather than pretending those issues don't have relevance to or impact on the topic at hand. That's a fine line, I know, but I think this board can handle it better than most. For me, the reference of Trump as a misogynist has nothing to do with politics, and it directly relates to the question of Knight's feelings toward Ohio State and its domestic violence situation as he was/is a vocal backer of Trump despite those character traits. Jesus Freakin' Christ. I really thought this was a thread for discussing B1G football. Just shaking my head in disgust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrflynn03 Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 Good time to resurrect this... http://www.hoosiersportsnation.com/index.php?/topic/1761-the-off-topic-thread/&tab=comments#comment-55166 Anyway, I like the way things are looking for IU this year in conference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CauseThatsMyDJ Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 1 hour ago, rico said: Jesus Freakin' Christ. I really thought this was a thread for discussing B1G football. Just shaking my head in disgust. Here you go, Rico. This post was about big ten football and sparked the conversation. And I’m 100% sure I can find a post from you elsewhere supporting topics going off-topic, so feel free to save it just because you don’t like it in this instance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoosiertildeath Posted September 16, 2018 Report Share Posted September 16, 2018 my 2 cents !! Earlier in this post it was brought out that on a pee yew web site some turkey posted IU Sucks ! LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO ! Those pee yew smellermakers are 0 AND 3 and have one of the WORST DEFENSIVE TEAMS IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY !! While our INDIANA HOOSIERS ARE SITTING 3 and 0 !! Who REALLY SUCKS ???????????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeking6 Posted September 17, 2018 Report Share Posted September 17, 2018 6 hours ago, FKIM01 said: Come on, DJ...as an admin you know better than this. You want me to start on Obama and Hillary? Isn't it a shame I can't ask a question and it goes that route? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muckraker Posted September 17, 2018 Report Share Posted September 17, 2018 8 hours ago, CauseThatsMyDJ said: Knight campaigned for Trump, so clearly he looks past mistreatment of women when it suits him. What an utterly stupid comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FKIM01 Posted September 17, 2018 Report Share Posted September 17, 2018 1 hour ago, hoosiertildeath said: my 2 cents !! Earlier in this post it was brought out that on a pee yew web site some turkey posted IU Sucks ! LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO ! Those pee yew smellermakers are 0 AND 3 and have one of the WORST DEFENSIVE TEAMS IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY !! While our INDIANA HOOSIERS ARE SITTING 3 and 0 !! Who REALLY SUCKS ???????????????? Turdue, that's who!!! Based on what I witnessed last night they certainly have to be one of the worst defensive teams in D1. I don't remember Brohm having a poor reputation as a defensive coach...what gives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FKIM01 Posted September 17, 2018 Report Share Posted September 17, 2018 3 hours ago, Seeking6 said: Isn't it a shame I can't ask a question and it goes that route? Yes it is but I'm ready to move on. It's just tiresome when I come here for sports talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblaz13 Posted September 17, 2018 Report Share Posted September 17, 2018 http://www.donbest.com/ncaaf/injuries/ Here is an injury report that came up when I searched in on google. This might help paint a more accurate picture of the extent of the early impact injuries or relative lack of may or may not be making at various programs on the current W/L records to greater degrees for which teams. I like to cross reference material like this with weekly depth charts, and vids, stats etc sometimes. Plus this is decent basis for proportional comparison of upper to lower body injuries for a given program, since it provides that general info for individuals. Wiscy is pretty hit right now. The leg injuries stand out, don't they, People are scratching their heads on a few boards about the BYU loss. Just an example. Helpful insight though for me personally at times even though I don't bet formally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeking6 Posted September 17, 2018 Report Share Posted September 17, 2018 12 hours ago, CauseThatsMyDJ said: Here you go, Rico. This post was about big ten football and sparked the conversation. And I’m 100% sure I can find a post from you elsewhere supporting topics going off-topic, so feel free to save it just because you don’t like it in this instance. My apologies to board for asking a question about a Big Ten football school in the Big Ten football thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoosiertildeath Posted September 17, 2018 Report Share Posted September 17, 2018 Friday Sept.21,2018 : Penn State [3 & 0] 37 Illinois [2 & 1] 20 . 9 PM FS1 Saturday September 22 ,2018: Minnesota [3 & 0 ] 29 Maryland 2 & 1 ] 27. Noon =BTN Michigan [2 & 1 ] 40 Nebraska [ 0 & 2 ] 20 . Noon -FS1 Boston College [3 & 0 ] 41 pee yew smellermakers[0 & 3 ] 32. Noon-ESPN-2 Hopefully, the smellermakers will be o & 4 after this game ! Buffalo [3 & 0 ] 39 Rutgers [1 & 2 ] 27 . Noon-BTN Ohio State [3 & 0 ] 47 Tulane [1 & 2 ] 24 .3:30 PM -BTN IU [ 3 & 0 ] 35 Michigan State [1 & 1 ] 23 . &;30 PM-BTN. Iowa [ 3 & 0 ] 25 Wisconsin [2 & 1 ] 19 . 8:30 PM -FOX Disclaimer: Any money won or lost are the sole responsibility of the person placing the bet ,VBG !!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CauseThatsMyDJ Posted September 17, 2018 Report Share Posted September 17, 2018 B1G Sagarin Ratings after week 3: https://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/ 2 - Ohio State 4 - Penn State 12 - Michigan 13 - Iowa 14 - Wisconsin 22 - Michigan State 40 - Minnesota 55 - Indiana 60- Northwestern 64 - Maryland 66 - Nebraska 79 - Purdue 91 - Illinois 129 - Rutgers B1G S&P+ Ratings after week 3: https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa 2 - Ohio State 8 - Penn State 10 - Michigan 13 - Wisconsin 20 - Michigan State 23 - Indiana 34 - Iowa 46 - Nebraska 48 - Minnesota 54 - Purdue 66 - Northwestern 81 - Maryland 99 - Illinois 114 - Rutgers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.