Jump to content

Jerome Hunter/Damezi Anderson

IUFLA

By IUFLA
in General Basketball Discussion

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply
IU Scott

IU Scott

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hoosierhoopster said:

Oh man, you keep coming back with this but of course, not once have you managed to describe what Smith does, you know, as a "3". You really should just drop this. You can't describe anything he does as a "3", because he doesn't play as a "3", or you have no grasp of what a "3" is. The real question, maybe, is why I even bother responding. Apparently, pointless. 

What is your definition of a 3 because I showed on our last two championship teams we did not have a typical 3.  Calloway was a good slasher and could shoot inside 15 feet but did not shot well from deep.  He also was not a great ball handler or great passer.  Kitchel was a great shooter from deep but was not a good ball handler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hoosierhoopster

Hoosierhoopster

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, IU Scott said:

What is your definition of a 3 because I showed on our last two championship teams we did not have a typical 3.  Calloway was a good slasher and could shoot inside 15 feet but did not shot well from deep.  He also was not a great ball handler or great passer.  Kitchel was a great shooter from deep but was not a good ball handler.

Scott, it's not my definition of a 3, it's what a 3 is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rico

rico

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Hoosierhoopster said:

No. Not going to play this game. You can pull up any one of my and Gleas's innumerable posts summarizing what everyone knows to be a 3. You don't have an alternative definition, Scott, a wing is a wing. Maybe you would like me to tell you what a point guard is?

Hang on a sec HH.  Are we talking chicken wings, turkey wings, pheasant wings, or buffalo wings?  Just being curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zlinedavid

Zlinedavid

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Reacher said:

I'd hate to bore you with mine. My 3 on 3 tournament stories are much better. I'd really like to hear some stories from ColonialCrester about his prison league. 

He has some interesting 3/3 stories. The first 3 stands for "3rd world hookers". I'll let you guess what the 2nd one stands for.

:coffee:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NotIThatLives

NotIThatLives

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Hoosierhoopster said:

Oh man, you keep coming back with this but of course, not once have you managed to describe what Smith does, you know, as a "3". You really should just drop this. You can't describe anything he does as a "3", because he doesn't play as a "3", or you have no grasp of what a "3" is. The real question, maybe, is why I even bother responding. Apparently, pointless. 

And with the slightest hint of disagreement, you're blocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dgambill

dgambill

Posted
Posted
On 11/26/2019 at 4:17 PM, IU Scott said:

What is your definition of a 3 because I showed on our last two championship teams we did not have a typical 3.  Calloway was a good slasher and could shoot inside 15 feet but did not shot well from deep.  He also was not a great ball handler or great passer.  Kitchel was a great shooter from deep but was not a good ball handler.

I don’t know because I’m so far behind but if you are asking the perfect IU “3” I would say Calbert Chaney...OG wasn’t bad either.....Romeo played the 3 all year last year. That said you got guys like Vic or Greg Graham that could slide over from the 2 in a 3 guard lineup or say if you had someone a little bigger like Brian Evans that could play 3 and sometimes 4. You want someone that is a threat from the outside but can also get to the basket and help defend on those taller athletic guys that will likely play the 3 on the opposing team. That said there is nothing wrong with playing a smaller guard at the 3 or a nontraditional non shooter bigger forward there as well which I think is what Justin is. That said prototypical shooting/size/athleticism on this roster that would be Jerome and Damezi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
coachv

coachv

Posted
Posted
On 11/26/2019 at 3:53 PM, Billingsley99 said:

If you run a 4 around 1 offense them which wing is the 3 and which is the 4? My guess 2 guards 2 wings and a post

 

I just figured out why I am out of coaching.  In 20 plus years I never used numbers.  Only In Practice when running out Carolina break drill.

didn't you have a playbook?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
coachv

coachv

Posted
Posted
On 11/26/2019 at 5:13 PM, Hoosierhoopster said:

Oh man, you keep coming back with this but of course, not once have you managed to describe what Smith does, you know, as a "3". You really should just drop this. You can't describe anything he does as a "3", because he doesn't play as a "3", or you have no grasp of what a "3" is. The real question, maybe, is why I even bother responding. Apparently, pointless. 

i have described what smoth does at the 3. i would look equally ridiculous if i came to where you work and tried to teach you how to do your job, administrator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...