5fouls Posted April 7, 2020 Report Share Posted April 7, 2020 I think the 90's version deserves it's own thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgambill Posted April 7, 2020 Report Share Posted April 7, 2020 1 minute ago, 5fouls said: I think Romeo and Gordon get in each others way, They have very similar games. You think they are both too ball dominant? They are very iso ball type players but I think with how Archie runs that weave out top they both would see ball enough...and I see Gordon hanging out more behind the arc and Romeo doing more of those slashes. But you could be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgambill Posted April 7, 2020 Report Share Posted April 7, 2020 16 minutes ago, 5fouls said: I think the 90's version deserves it's own thread. Agreed. Also the 90s has fewer players. I think another column is needed. NVMD I realized the 2000s had guys from 2000-2019 so two decades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoB2011 Posted April 7, 2020 Report Share Posted April 7, 2020 26 minutes ago, 5fouls said: I think Romeo and Gordon get in each others way, They have very similar games. I worried that between Gordon, Langford and Vic that there wouldn't be enough touches, but I concluded that Gordon and Vic play just fine off the ball, Lewis is a pass-first PG and Newton can play without the ball. All 5 guys on my team are good passers, I think it will work out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
go_iu_bb Posted April 7, 2020 Report Share Posted April 7, 2020 40 minutes ago, dgambill said: Agreed. Also the 90s has fewer players. I think another column is needed. NVMD I realized the 2000s had guys from 2000-2019 so two decades. It is also not restricted to the players shown. At the bottom of that one it says any other 90s players for $1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgambill Posted April 7, 2020 Report Share Posted April 7, 2020 12 minutes ago, go_iu_bb said: It is also not restricted to the players shown. At the bottom of that one it says any other 90s players for $1. Oh wow...Jason Collier/Lawrence Funderburke for a $1!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IU Scott Posted April 7, 2020 Report Share Posted April 7, 2020 3 hours ago, go_iu_bb said: Cheaney(5) Graham(4) Nover(3) Haston(2) Meeks(1) I would rather have Henderson over Nover or Haston but can't make it work with 2 5's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgambill Posted April 8, 2020 Report Share Posted April 8, 2020 With the addition of any 90s player for a $1 I might consider changing to C-Collier($1) PF-Evans ($4) SF-Chaney($5) SG-G.Graham($4) PG-Meeks($1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCHoosier32 Posted April 8, 2020 Report Share Posted April 8, 2020 this seems easier: Reed $2 - solid all around guard Haston $2 - solid scoring big Cheaney $5 - best scorer Lewis $3 - all time assists leader Patterson $3 - unbelievable athleticism and potential Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCHoosier32 Posted April 8, 2020 Report Share Posted April 8, 2020 i guess you could go Evans 4 Anderson 4 Lewis 3 Reed 2 Haston 2 i was pretty shocked when i saw where Eric Anderson was on the all time scoring list. Haston at 2 seems like a gimme and Lewis at a 2 as the all time assists leader the same. Evans was pretty impressive as a senior as well. his numbers surprised me a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.