Jump to content

Kansas & Self

Inequality

Recommended Posts

BGleas

BGleas

Posted
Posted

We all know what's going to happen here. KU will fight the charges and then negotiate some setup where the school pays a fine, maybe they vacate some insignificant wins, lose a scholarship and Self will take a "X" number of games ban that is just enough that the NCAA can put it in a headline on a press release but just few enough that he only misses games against teams ranked 250 or below in the RPI. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BobSaccamanno

BobSaccamanno

Posted
Posted

LSU has got to be next.  But this is the Charlie Brown football thing.   Kansas should probably get 3 years with no tourney and Self should be banned.  LSU, same thing.  Louisville too.  None of this will happen until proven otherwise because the NCAA is a fundamentally corrupt and inept organization.   But Cleveland State better watch out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
13th&Jackson

13th&Jackson

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, BobSaccamanno said:

LSU has got to be next.  But this is the Charlie Brown football thing.   Kansas should probably get 3 years with no tourney and Self should be banned.  LSU, same thing.  Louisville too.  None of this will happen until proven otherwise because the NCAA is a fundamentally corrupt and inept organization.   But Cleveland State better watch out.  

Kansas will have to vacate their 2020 NCAAT appearance

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hoosierhoopster

Hoosierhoopster

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BGleas said:

We all know what's going to happen here. KU will fight the charges and then negotiate some setup where the school pays a fine, maybe they vacate some insignificant wins, lose a scholarship and Self will take a "X" number of games ban that is just enough that the NCAA can put it in a headline on a press release but just few enough that he only misses games against teams ranked 250 or below in the RPI. 

Unfortunately, UNC in particular set the table for how to respond to and fend off the NCAA. Just think about UNC's decades-long academic fraud, and the fact that absolutely nothing happened to it since it just kept denying its well documented academic fraud and fought the NCAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Inequality

Inequality

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, BGleas said:

We all know what's going to happen here. KU will fight the charges and then negotiate some setup where the school pays a fine, maybe they vacate some insignificant wins, lose a scholarship and Self will take a "X" number of games ban that is just enough that the NCAA can put it in a headline on a press release but just few enough that he only misses games against teams ranked 250 or below in the RPI. 

Hey, that’s more than I’m expecting tbh.

Too bad it’s Self in hot water this time and not Cal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
go_iu_bb

go_iu_bb

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hoosierhoopster said:

Unfortunately, UNC in particular set the table for how to respond to and fend off the NCAA. Just think about UNC's decades-long academic fraud, and the fact that absolutely nothing happened to it since it just kept denying its well documented academic fraud and fought the NCAA.

The difference with UNC is that was academics that was also offered to non-athletes and so fell outside the purview of the NCAA. Not allowing payments falls squarely in what the NCAA claims to regulate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
IUCrazy2

IUCrazy2

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, IU Scott said:

KU and UL both needs to get the death penalty.

Why just them?

All the Adidas schools getting hung out to dry have an argument that the NCAA is not enforcing their rules equally.  Zion Williamson was getting paid.  Adidas was not bidding against themselves...and Duke and Kentucky have been the two schools that have recruited better than anyone lately.

If I were them I would tell the NCAA to get bent.  No cooperation at all.  Why allow yourself to be a whipping boy when you know your competitors were neck deep in the same sh--.  The NCAA can smell them from the next room but won't open that Nike door to see what is behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Indykev

Indykev

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, Seeking6 said:

Case will come down to if a court thinks Adidas is a booster. Kansas says no. NCAA says yes. I'll put my $ on Kansas right now.

Adidas pays KU, of course they are a booster in the big picture of things. It would be no different than any other company that gives money to a school then turns around and that company pays a kid to play there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Seeking6

Seeking6

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Indykev said:

Adidas pays KU, of course they are a booster in the big picture of things. It would be no different than any other company that gives money to a school then turns around and that company pays a kid to play there.

Kind of along the lines of what the definition of is is. Courts and language and the public aren't always on the same page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DWB

DWB

Posted
Posted
On 5/7/2020 at 6:37 PM, Seeking6 said:

Honestly...who even actually believes a thing will happen. Until it does. I laugh at these headlines. 

Ball State better watch out, the KU penalties could be severe (and assigned to BSU)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...