Jump to content

Colts game thread-Bills 1/9


rico

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Leathernecks said:

Here is the math on the Colts going for 2.  These calculations all assumes the Bills don't score, but them scoring doesn't change the overall point.

The league conversion rate on 2 point attempts averages just under 50%.

That means based on averages, you get it half the time, and the next time you score, you get the extra point almost 95% of the time.  That means you would win in regulation roughly 47.5% of the time.

If you miss the first conversion, you have another 50% of getting the 2nd one.  That means roughly 25% of the time you get the 2nd conversion and get to overtime.  Add in the other 2.5% from the odds of missing the extra point after getting the first conversion.  In overtime, you basically have a 50/50 chance.  That means you win half of that 27.5% which would be 13.75%.

The odds of missing the first and second 2 point conversions and losing in regulation would be roughly 25%.

Breaking it down more, here are the results from a math perspective.

Win = 61%

Lose in regulation = 25%

Lose in overtime = 14%

Moral of the story, the math says you're better off going for 2 in that situation.  Especially when the penalty moves the ball to the 1 since the odds of getting the first one would go up.

This also doesn't take away from the many other questionable decisions the Colts have made today!

You don't play football with a calculator and doing do is hurting the game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, IU Scott said:

You don't play football with a calculator and doing do is hurting the game

There is a reason analytics are in sports now.  It is because over time, they work.  Trying to look at one specific situation and making a claim about it doesn't work.  The Colts got that 2 point conversion, and made up for missing the first.  That's how that decision works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hoosierfan1901 said:

Missing that FG now

Well going for it in on 4th down and not kicking the fg is killing us.  I guess some stat geek came up with some stupid formula saying it is better to go for it. This is a sport and people need to stop making it more difficult than it really is.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, IU Scott said:

Well going for it in on 4th down and not kicking the fg is killing us.  I guess some stat geek came up with some stupid formula saying it is better to go for it. This is a sport and people need to stop making it more difficult than it really is.

 

That’s what I meant, and the 33 yarder was a killer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...