Steubenhoosier Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 1 minute ago, KoB2011 said: You'd only think info would immediately trickle out of a BOT meeting if you think someone's source is on the BOT. I've never seen any reason to believe that to be the case. Yeah, I am highly skeptical that any random message board poster knows anything more than the lady working the cash register at the Kroger’s on 3rd St... Hell, for all we know, she may be more tuned in than anyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
13th&Jackson Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 1 hour ago, OGIUAndy said: My question would be, didn’t he know there would be possible sanctions when he took the job? What’s changed in that regard. He did, but I think things changed in December. I believe Louisville was holding to the position that they were a victim in the Adidas scandal. The NCAA denied that and is arguing that Adidas was acting on Louisville’s behalf. It looks like they’ll be hit harder than they thought. https://www.wdrb.com/sports/ncaa-enforcement-staff-rejects-louisville-arguments-in-pay-for-play-infractions-case/article_ea9db5a8-3899-11eb-8c12-171fa3bc694c.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steubenhoosier Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 12 minutes ago, BADGERVOL said: Because someone knows what time it was at? Or, someone knows that there really was a meeting to discuss the men’s basketball program? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoB2011 Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 4 minutes ago, Steubenhoosier said: Yeah, I am highly skeptical that any random message board poster knows anything more than the lady working the cash register at the Kroger’s on 3rd St... Hell, for all we know, she may be more tuned in than anyone You work with numbers for a living, right? I think we can all agree the math on any individual poster having inside info is low. The math that no individual posters have inside info is also very low. At that point you're left looking at a posters history and the sort of claims they're making to determine what to believe or not. If you don't want to believe anything go for it, but you're almost assuredly discarding credible information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADGERVOL Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 3 minutes ago, KoB2011 said: You work with numbers for a living, right? I think we can all agree the math on any individual poster having inside info is low. The math that no individual posters have inside info is also very low. At that point you're left looking at a posters history and the sort of claims they're making to determine what to believe or not. If you don't want to believe anything go for it, but you're almost assuredly discarding credible information. I was going to make the case that either you believe NO one anywhere can have insider info OR there is a small pocket out there that does. If it’s the latter, then it’s a matter of which individuals you trust or don’t trust who claim to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
13th&Jackson Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 6 minutes ago, KoB2011 said: You work with numbers for a living, right? I think we can all agree the math on any individual poster having inside info is low. The math that no individual posters have inside info is also very low. At that point you're left looking at a posters history and the sort of claims they're making to determine what to believe or not. If you don't want to believe anything go for it, but you're almost assuredly discarding credible information. 2 minutes ago, BADGERVOL said: I was going to make the case that either you believe NO one anywhere can have insider info OR there is a small pocket out there that does. If it’s the latter, then it’s a matter of which individuals you trust or don’t trust who claim to be. This is eerily similar to a Finite Mathematics test question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steubenhoosier Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 5 minutes ago, KoB2011 said: You work with numbers for a living, right? I think we can all agree the math on any individual poster having inside info is low. The math that no individual posters have inside info is also very low. At that point you're left looking at a posters history and the sort of claims they're making to determine what to believe or not. If you don't want to believe anything go for it, but you're almost assuredly discarding credible information. Your right, I do work with numbers. And I work evaluating the risk/reward relationship and determine whether the information I have justifies taking associated risks. I have found that oftentimes, when the majority are espousing one course of action, it’s imperative to look at the other side. This message board, for the most part has endorsed the idea that Archie has to go. As such, posters seek out whatever information they think supports that argument... including ascribing the label “insider” to someone whose information supports the narrative. If there has been a meeting and if CAM’s buyout is the reason why, then we’ll know soon enough. Until then, I remain skeptical Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADGERVOL Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 2 minutes ago, Steubenhoosier said: Your right, I do work with numbers. And I work evaluating the risk/reward relationship and determine whether the information I have justifies taking associated risks. I have found that oftentimes, when the majority are espousing one course of action, it’s imperative to look at the other side. This message board, for the most part has endorsed the idea that Archie has to go. As such, posters seek out whatever information they think supports that argument... including ascribing the label “insider” to someone whose information supports the narrative. If there has been a meeting and if CAM’s buyout is the reason why, then we’ll know soon enough. Until then, I remain skeptical Are you equally skeptical of your own skepticism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brass Cannon Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 Chris007 has a relatively proven track record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steubenhoosier Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 2 minutes ago, BADGERVOL said: Are you equally skeptical of your own skepticism? Do I question my decisions... absolutely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steubenhoosier Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 1 minute ago, Brass Cannon said: Chris007 has a relatively proven track record. Never heard of him. He’s never posted here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proud2BAHoosier Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 IMO, nothing will be determined until after the BTT. Again, JMO.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGIUAndy Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 Just now, Brass Cannon said: Chris007 has a relatively proven track record. He does, for sure. But I remember no one really knowing Archie was the guy until maybe a day or hours before everyone knew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IUwins0708 Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 Meeting started 15 minutes ago, as far as what I was told. I don’t want Archie back but I’m just relaying information and if I hear he’s coming back I’ll say it. Not sure what I say on a message board has any bearing on wether he comes back or not. I never said this meeting was about Archie in the first place, all I said was it was odd timing to have a meeting with an AD and the BoT. Could be something totally different, even though the timing would suggest otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artesian_86 Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 15 minutes ago, Steubenhoosier said: Your right, I do work with numbers. And I work evaluating the risk/reward relationship and determine whether the information I have justifies taking associated risks. I have found that oftentimes, when the majority are espousing one course of action, it’s imperative to look at the other side. This message board, for the most part has endorsed the idea that Archie has to go. As such, posters seek out whatever information they think supports that argument... including ascribing the label “insider” to someone whose information supports the narrative. If there has been a meeting and if CAM’s buyout is the reason why, then we’ll know soon enough. Until then, I remain skeptical That goes without saying and skepticism in totally acceptable......I believe we all are, to some capacity. I want changes and results NOW just like everyone else. I’m just going to have to trust that “something’s a foot”and something more concrete will comes out soon, in due time........ Did I forget to mention that I’m an impatient person?😬 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artesian_86 Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 2 minutes ago, IUwins0708 said: Meeting started 15 minutes ago, as far as what I was told. I don’t want Archie back but I’m just relaying information and if I hear he’s coming back I’ll say it. Not sure what I say on a message board has any bearing on wether he comes back or not. I never said this meeting was about Archie in the first place, all I said was it was odd timing to have a meeting with an AD and the BoT. Could be something totally different, even though the timing would suggest otherwise. Thanks IUwins0708! I appreciate what you bring to this board and your honesty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADGERVOL Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 7 minutes ago, IUwins0708 said: Meeting started 15 minutes ago, as far as what I was told. I don’t want Archie back but I’m just relaying information and if I hear he’s coming back I’ll say it. Not sure what I say on a message board has any bearing on wether he comes back or not. I never said this meeting was about Archie in the first place, all I said was it was odd timing to have a meeting with an AD and the BoT. Could be something totally different, even though the timing would suggest otherwise. I heard they’re discussing the removal of Dr. Seuss books from the University Library. 🤷🏻♂️😕 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosierfan1901 Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 17 minutes ago, IUwins0708 said: Meeting started 15 minutes ago, as far as what I was told. I don’t want Archie back but I’m just relaying information and if I hear he’s coming back I’ll say it. Not sure what I say on a message board has any bearing on wether he comes back or not. I never said this meeting was about Archie in the first place, all I said was it was odd timing to have a meeting with an AD and the BoT. Could be something totally different, even though the timing would suggest otherwise. Nah, just arranging a flight for Billy Donovan! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IU247 Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 21 minutes ago, IUwins0708 said: Meeting started 15 minutes ago, as far as what I was told. I don’t want Archie back but I’m just relaying information and if I hear he’s coming back I’ll say it. Not sure what I say on a message board has any bearing on wether he comes back or not. I never said this meeting was about Archie in the first place, all I said was it was odd timing to have a meeting with an AD and the BoT. Could be something totally different, even though the timing would suggest otherwise. 6 year extension for Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steubenhoosier Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 13 minutes ago, BADGERVOL said: I heard they’re discussing the removal of Dr. Seuss books from the University Library. 🤷🏻♂️😕 Pretty sure that they are... First off, they’re trying to remove CAM I am😁 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jefftheref Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 22 minutes ago, IUwins0708 said: Meeting started 15 minutes ago, as far as what I was told. I don’t want Archie back but I’m just relaying information and if I hear he’s coming back I’ll say it. Not sure what I say on a message board has any bearing on wether he comes back or not. I never said this meeting was about Archie in the first place, all I said was it was odd timing to have a meeting with an AD and the BoT. Could be something totally different, even though the timing would suggest otherwise. Thank you for the information. I really appreciate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADGERVOL Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 Chop Chop BoT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADGERVOL Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 First order of business...do we suck? yes we suck do we have a second? I, I, second, I second, I second that, I agree, I, yes I do also, I second! I third that S%#& Ok, we do in fact suck... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDB Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 1 hour ago, KoB2011 said: You work with numbers for a living, right? I think we can all agree the math on any individual poster having inside info is low. The math that no individual posters have inside info is also very low. At that point you're left looking at a posters history and the sort of claims they're making to determine what to believe or not. If you don't want to believe anything go for it, but you're almost assuredly discarding credible information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADGERVOL Posted March 7, 2021 Report Share Posted March 7, 2021 Roll Call... Who is pushing refresh no more than every 15min or less? Be honest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.