Jump to content

Big Ten 2021


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Stlboiler23 said:

We must be watching two different teams honestly. Purdue has some flaws but the defense is much better and the offense is decent enough. Obviously losing one of the top WR’s in the conference would be a huge blow that could derail the season like when we lost Rondale. 

We will see, like i said nothing i see from them says bowl team to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stlboiler23 said:

We must be watching two different teams honestly. Purdue has some flaws but the defense is much better and the offense is decent enough. Obviously losing one of the top WR’s in the conference would be a huge blow that could derail the season like when we lost Rondale. 

Have they said what his injury was

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, IU Scott said:

Have they said what his injury was

Nope but they did say he was able to walk off under his own power. Will probably know more Monday I’d think. 
 

We did just find out a few minutes ago that our CB Trice will “be out for awhile” so that blows. 

Edited by Stlboiler23
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Steubenhoosier said:

Alrighty then.

Always enjoy the astuteness of a Purdue educated person 

I mean I’ve told you many many times if you don’t like me posting either put me on ignore or just don’t reply yet you keep doing it. You don’t like me posting that’s fine. Why you continue with the same old song and dance is beyond me. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Stlboiler23 said:

I mean I’ve told you many many times if you don’t like me posting either put me on ignore or just don’t reply yet you keep doing it. You don’t like me posting that’s fine. Why you continue with the same old song and dance is beyond me. 

Here’s hoping you finally realize that no one cares about the Smellermakers or your opinion on this forum 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Leathernecks said:

I am so tired of these targeting calls. The guy was going to reach out for the endzone, so he dove at him. It's targeting by the rule, but it is such a garbage rule. It should only be an ejection if you really light somebody up.

Here's an example of what a targeting ejection should look like.

 

They have got to change this ejection rule. It's such a blatantly horrible rule to anyone with a brain.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BGleas said:

They have got to change this ejection rule. It's such a blatantly horrible rule to anyone with a brain.  

I don't think it's that hard, either. Targeting 1 is akin to a facemask, roughing the passer, etc. Targeting 2 is acting with malice/intent and results in ejection.

Honestly, I think they need to change this now, not wait until next season.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BGleas said:

They have got to change this ejection rule. It's such a blatantly horrible rule to anyone with a brain.  

Yep. To think that McFadden, who only made contact with the QB because he was shoved in the back by an offensive lineman, was punished the same as a guy running top speed and launching himself like a spear into someone’s helmet, is beyond stupid. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...