iuswingman

So basically if Reneau turned into MM?

Having 2 players in the post that have no outside games clogs the inside and replacing Ware with Ballo makes that issue even worse than it was last season.

He would be better as our only starting post big. MM could easily handle the 4 in college.

true but I think chairs at IU were tied down even after Knight left. never know when someone might copycat.

the potted plants must be nailed to the floor now.

If portland is as good as bloomington then sounds like a great place to live.

I guess when we are throwing around millions, anything is possible.

And I will be happy when KC announces. The problem still is the addition of Ballo means we are going to again clog the post with bigs which is why adding him was great and bad at the same time.

How so? The debate would be whether or not more outside shooters are needed. We definitely need better outside shooting much more than we needed another big body clogging up the post. I would rather that 1.2 million (or some of it) go towards the best shooting guard in the portal.

following who?

True. Although it is probably generally better to be more hands off in that situation vs rocking the boat with a heavy stick.

True, our opinions are based on incomplete information but if pro-Palestinian was an accurate generalization then I don't see how the exhibit should have been cancelled. Those that were offended could just boycott it. It would have to move towards antisemitism or saying Israel deserved to be attacked for it to move to towards that line of being cancel worthy imo. Anyone who complains about becoming a nation of cancelling people for their views should see this in that same light based on what little is known. But if those posts come to light and are much worse than expected then of course my opinion may change so put an asterisk next to it for now. I've heard quite a bit of people complaining of liberal bias in universities. If that is an issue then conservative bias should be just as much an issue.

Although it does says that it is a common scenario in these types of votes, not that it was the reason this time or that it was just referring to IU only. That may have just been contrasting the reasonsing for Whitten's vote of no confidence verses what most vote of no confidences are about.

So it was ok to cancel the exhibit because of her ideology? And here I have been led to believe canceling people was wrong. If roles were reversed, then I would wager the people defending her would be taking an opposite stance. Between that and failing to support the Dr that was attacked by rokita, she deserved the vote of no confidence.

The complaints against Whitten seem pretty valid to me. Abuse due to political bias should be wrong regardless of what side of the aisle