iuswingman

I think the sisley train would have already left the station one way or another by then.

so a more under control XJ?

oh my bad, didn't realize commenting about choice of travel was off limits.

was the contact period only today? Just thought it was odd to be flying around in-state but whatever. Hopefully it helps and 2025 bears more fruit than 2024.

no wonder our recruiting budget dwarfs everyone else's budget. Can't even drive for in-state visits lol

Is Woodson not responsible? He could easily say the same about pro-woodson people that are working hard to give him a pass.

If Goode is strictly a 3, then wonder if MM will end up slotting at the 4 some. Then you also have Tucker but he could probably fill in at a few positions. I'm hoping our backup 4 does open things up with outside shooting regardless of whether he is called a wing or big.

I just said they were unproven and they were unproven. We had XJ, who had played just 11 games the season before, Galloway and a bunch of players that hadn't played much at all or not at all. We also had an open scholarship. I think the opinion that Woodson should have brought in better competition at the guard spot is valid and foreseeable prior to the season starting.

They still have a shot to earn playing time but there should have been more competition. This isn't a casual church league. You play to win, not to make sure everyone gets a shot.

Maybe not injury prone but he played in 11 games in 22/23. You think relying on him and a freshman PG as backup was a good idea?

It isn't hindsight when people were pointing out our guard deficiency before the season even started and then were proven correct. Why should his job have to be on the line in order to put the best product on the floor or best depth?

Naming players that didn't work out doesn't really prove the point you think it does.

Woodson wasn't to blame for going into the season with an injury prone PG, Galloway and a bunch of unknowns/unproven backups? Yea, I don't agree with that one bit.

No, I would fill the scholarship with a project that I would hope develops and worst case scenario be a good player to practice against for a year. If he doesn't develop and we need the scholarship the next year, then yea, it would be a 1 year rental. But someone in that position would do it for the chance to prove themselves.

Do you have a link to those stats with percentage of schools that don't use all 13 scholarships? I would have guessed most schools use all of them. I don't recall very many years where IU went through a season with an open scholarship but don't follow other schools to know if that's normal.

No issue with being patient with it. And yet empty chair is unable to enter the game as needed. Last scholarship player is unlikely to see much court time anyway but better to have and not need than need and not have.

Over an empty chair, sure.

Never know how injuries will play out or how all the newcomers will do. Everyone on this board likely wished we had another guard on this team last season instead of an empty seat.

we don't need to to keep an open scholarship. pick up a sleeper to take a shot on if nothing else.

So is Goode a higher priority over Anderson? Goode: 5.7 PPG, 3.6 RPG, 0.6 APG, 39.7 FG%, 38.9 3FG% Anderson: 12.8 PPG, 5.1 RPG, 1.9 APG, 48.2 FG%, 45.9 3FG% Of course, Goode is playing against tougher competition, at least in conference.

His percentages were much higher when taking good set/open shots. He doesn't need to be taught how to shoot. He needs to be better at deciding when to shoot. The latter is much easier to fix.