IU Scott

It sure has

Not an excuse but when I was playing basketball I never wore my glasses. That day I had them on and it made the goal look a lot closer

I loved 87 as well

I don't think you would want that to happen. At the state finals me and my brother went over to the outside courts next to the Fieldhouse. I haven't shot a basketball for years and let me tell you my shit wasn't pretty. Back in the day I would take my shooting ability but not now

It is the dead period for recruiting

Born 1970 and RMK was the only coach I knew for my first 30 years. I don't remember everything about the 76 team but remember everything about the 81 team. That team was probably my favorite IU team I remember watching at IU. I think the expectations should be competing for big ten championships and making the tournament every year or at least 8 or 9 out 10 years. Even under Knight we weren't competing for a national title every year but built a strong team over 3 or 4 years to a championship caliber team. I think that shot be the expectations at IU

Watching Assembly Call last night and they are hearing that the coaching staff is trying to to bring in players with multi years of eligibility left.

What stinks

That will be a great weekend with the spring game that weekend as well

You know two other coaches on that Cleveland staff. Bill Bielichek and Nic Saban

Yes they were horrible last year. I was at the NO game and it was the worst defensive performance I have seen. Venturi was a DC for years in the NFL and he just can't stand the defensive philosophy of Bradley. He thinks it is to conservative and vanilla and they don't make it hard for WR's to get off the line

I heard that stat from Rick Venturi on the radio. Just had a chance and Sports Reference 28th in PPG 24th YPG

So how long does he get to get on from Luck 10 more years LOL!. I hope you are correct on this team and Ballard but you are in the minority you still backs Ballard I have a question for you. Why are you so willing to keep giving Ballard passes after 7 years but you want Woodson gone after 3 Woodson has had more success than Ballard's teams had.

The defense was ranked 25th last year. None of the TE's on their roster are difference makers. Pittman is pretty much a possession receiver and doesn't go down field and only had like two touchdowns last year.

The thing is the Texans are a better team today than they were in that last game. The Colts aren't any better today than in that lady game. I think it is putting to much pressure on Richardson to expect him to come in and be the saviour of this team. You need to build around him and give him as much help as possible. He needs playmakers on offense and give him a good defense so the offense doesn't have to always win the game

Luck has been retired for 5 years so it is time to stop using that as an excuse

Reds beat the Phillies 4-1 Frankie Montas with his second straight good start 5.2IP, 1 run

Like I said earlier he would have been fired already in most organizations. I find it funny that some of you who support Ballard are the ones who wants Woodson gone. Woodson has a winning season ever year and made the tournament 2 out of 3 years and has 4 BTT wins and two tournament wins. Ballard has a losing record and made the playoffs 2 out of 7 years with 1 playoff win.

That plan hasn't produced for 7 years, how long are we supposed to wait

I know that. Thing I don’t understand is if Dusty is such a home run hire why are all the players abandoning ship? Afraid they’re going to get coach Primed? you asked this question and I told you the reason, they left before Dusty got there

Campbell didn't work out and the problem with this pick is the other WR's we didn't pick in that draft like Brown

They put their name in the portal before Dusty was hired

Ballard is lucky he is working for Irsay because I don't see many other organizations giving their GM this much time. With his record he would have been fired already

Wilson, Hooker, Banagu, Turay just off the top of my head. Like I said I didn't like Grigson either but if you defense of Ballard is that he is better than Grigson that is a low bar. I hope I am wrong and the Colts prove me wrong this year but I see them 3rd in the South at best.

I know who Ballard has drafted and there are way to many misses early in the draft especially in the second round. You might think some of these players are better than I think they are.