kyhoosier29

I can take it. But we’re 14-12 (6-10)…. With the environment and rhetoric going on, I’d say bad timing. This isn’t a Purdue board. I wouldn’t poke the bear on a Purdue message board with a similar situation going on. Do any IU fans even participate on Purdue forums?

Prob bad timing on this. Easy way to wear out your welcome with a lot of people who typically tolerate or are cordial. If an IU fan gave this prediction on your board, fine. But coming here and pointing stuff out like this?

Sorry folks, I’ll be there, so there’s no way we win. We’re 1-3 the last four home games I attended.

I think it says a ton that this post game thread is only three pages long. 😳

I’m to the point where I just want IU to win, don’t care who the answer is. But I’m not okay with what went on when Sampson was here. Wonder if Houston’s players are doing the same things.

I wouldn’t consider myself in the “must go now” crowd ONLY bc I’m concerned about what that does to ‘25 recruits and Liam for next year. However, I don’t think these kids would want to play for what they’ve seen of Woodson and if they do, I’m not sure the results are better bc of the style. So because of that, I’m leaning towards it might as well happen now. If we had a played a totally different style this year due to personnel…Woodson tailoring the scheme to what he has because of recruiting misses….then maybe I’d have some confidence he could fix it. But the style has been exactly the same, except we’ve gotten worse at it.

He hit multiple threes?

Nothing new can be said. I’d love to just see us try something different. I don’t care if we get beat by 40, but for crying out loud nothing changes. Woodson thinks the crappy shooting team he put together is just going to start shooting it well, or they’re just going to start playing better D. Press a little bit, or play a 1-2-2…. try something to get more transition buckets. We’re going to give up 80+ every game anyway. Give SOMETHING new a look for crying out loud.

I can’t stand Baldwin, drama and flops left and right. But Ware did put his hands on him unnecessarily.

Ware with his 4th. Stupidity at its finest. Try again on Tues.

Very good points and I can’t disagree. You’re right, it shouldn’t be about what’s fair to him. It should be about, is he the right guy to move us forward? I’m just on the fence, given the fact he did make the last two NCAA tournaments (certainly have my own opinion, similar to many others why he did, but that’s debatable at best) does he deserve another year to prove he his? On the other side, every part of the game has deteriorated over the last three years, along with his stubbornness to adjust, I have zero faith he’s the right guy. I think I said I wasn’t going to debate in this thread. 😂🥴

Now that’s funny!

I’m between 3-4. I’m thinking he MIGHT deserve another year and prob gets another year, but I’m leaning towards the fact he shouldn’t get another year. I am teetering bc I don’t know what’s best for next year. Sorry, just giving a reason for why I voted the way I did. I won’t debate it. 😂

In only 14 min. 😳

I truly hope it is. Contrary to some beliefs, I’m not rooting for failure. Shit, I’m driving two and a half hours on Tuesday night to go to the game. 🥴 Certainly not going to root for a loss.

Yes, the man should know more than us (not disputing that), but it’s not translating. We see the same mistakes over, and over, and over, and over again with no adjustments or accountability.

I’ll be “shocked” with a win. Just don’t see it. But Woodson knows more than we do, so I’m sure we’re wrong.

Facts are facts ….. yet, you rarely use them (except in your pregame breakdowns). 😂 Again, deflected the previous post about grouping people together. Reading comprehension …. “You dispute…”. No I didn’t say anything about him knowing more or less. Its was the quote you’ve used over and over. I said nobody cares. Just bc he knows more doesn’t mean he can coach (that’s the argument most use). But that’s your response to everything. If you don’t want to debate what’s being said, don’t comment, but posting that crap over and over is worthless. No interest in arguing with you at all, but along with your repetitive comment about Woodson knowing more, many of your posts recently have been direct criticisms of people or groups of people on this board. You think it’s your personal job to defend Woodson at every turn. Defend away, just don’t insult. Speaking about comprehending, you don’t understand what “debate the post, not the poster” means, or you refuse to abide by it. I try not to read your crap, but again the 💩 is all over every thread littering them up with the same comments or attacking somebody else’s opinions as ignorant. But hey, you make sure the dissenting “opinions” and mob mentality (whatever that is on this board) do not prevail. What a worthy cause that is. 😉 You can have the last words. Idc. I’m sure they will be riveting with facts. I’m also sure most don’t want to read the bickering, so I’m done. The apathy is about the same as it is with your idol.

Whose reading comprehension is challenged? If you group me in with “some of you” you’re speaking of me correct? I refuted the two points you made saying that doesn’t include me, so keep trying to deflect, you do it in every post. I think you got the roles reversed. I don’t give two shits what your opinion is, when you give it. But the problem is it’s never on topic and you clutter up every thread following negative comments that pretty much just include …… “MIKE WOODSON KNOWS MORE THAN ANYBODY ON THIS BOARD AND IS A GREAT MAN ACCORDING TO PEOPLE THAT KNOW HIM.” So who’s trying to quiet other people? Nobody cares. Great value to the board. I’m sure your response will be … “well you guys” blah, blah, blah. If you want to debate my comments, debate them with some originality. I’m sure you’ll struggle to find the few comments I make because they’re littered with your reiterations.

Get your facts straight …. I don’t recall ever saying a word about Armond Hill, nor do I care about what he does. Also don’t recall ever making comments about partying. But at all cost in defending Woodson, just throw 💩 against the wall and hope it sticks. If your goal is to clutter the board with fantasy and annoy people, you’re doing well. The circus seems to fit you best, so carry on….

Good lord you’re beyond exhausting with some of your nonsense. We’ve all seen him lay into players. Nobody said he reserved it for just Gallo. But we did say that we’d be ripping into other players before Gallo. Tough for you to understand because you’re so blinded by your constant desire to defend him at every turn. This wasn’t really about anybody, just an observation. I doubt it was coaching though bc he hasn’t done much of that this year.

Women looked good. They can really shoot it. So much more fun watching more of a 1 in, 4 out type offense, or at least having four on the floor at the same time that can play the perimeter. Clark had an off night, but man she can play. Almost had a triple double anyway. Her passing ability is unreal. Definitely the best women’s player I’ve ever seen. I was embarrassed for the officials in this game. What a horrid job they did.

We don’t know why he was ripping him, but I was thinking something similar. Plenty of guys I’d be ripping before Gallo.

I think they need this one just to prove they have the ability to compete with the more elite teams.

You seriously think that? Kid comes from an Indiana family. I guarantee others could be appealing as well. If it was all about Shrewsberry he would have committed to Notre Dame by now.