btownqb

LETSS GOOOOOO

It was a guess, but "in home" I assumed meant at their home in whatever town they live in. Could be wrong, though.

Bloomington to Fishers to Greenfield to Heritage Hills is a haul

Fishers to Heritage Hills is a HAUL

I still think there are no less than 15 mins a game for Goode and some games 20 mins+.... Tucker is a FR, Malik has foul trouble, and Goode is be our 1st or 2nd best shooter. Maybe Notre Dame can offer more than that, but I think the minutes are there, I really do. @ledies22

I have no idea, Jamie Shaw seems pretty confident, though.

I fail to see any mins left at the 1-3, especially if Goode is added. Heck, the backup roles are already filled in those spots, as well.

Not to dive too much into this, since it's the expectations thread, but I think he (CMW) could really make life easier on himself... by just getting Malik/Ballo out of the game early--- 16/17 minute mark-- get one of them out, get TG in... Bring the other back in at the 13/14 minute mark when the other one needs a break... and then go from there. The caveat is Malik's foul trouble, while it improved drastically from his FR year-- there's still work to be done... at the same time, I don't think Malik needs to average much over 28/29 mins anyway, he was at that mark this past season.

There isn't some plethora of D1 basketball recruits coming out of FW anyway. Football on the other hand....

We'll see... either way, I'd prefer someone else. These aren't my ideas, stolen from another poster, but I agreed with him--- Moussa Cisse , Justice Ajogbor

You're underestimating Purdue's willingness to be petty.

I'd prefer a better rim protector than Furst, he does rebound well, though. Don't see the Purdue to IU thing happening.

Make it fit, right? I see it.

And I get that. But again, it was the combo of all of those decisions.

Those types of players can usually dribble. I am not the D1 HC that offered Indiana fans one of the more shit seasons in its history by trusting Gunn and others. I see little that contradicts that. Terrible decisions by our staff and our terrible development. One of those two stick, you can choose which one.

I loved the idea of him being 6'6, etc etc... but that one little comment isn't the same as Woodson and staff seeing an entire years worth of data and practices and then keeping him. But this is just a piece of the complaint.. it was all 4 of those guys plus Newton, plus XJ, plus empty scholly. All of that combined.

Yes. I'm sure.

Yeah my crimson colored glasses that day were thick. Kid sucks. "6'6 long athletic" should have trusted my initial evaluation.

He doesn't get points for trying. I doubt every stone was turned over.

The numbers and avgs don't matter a hill of beans to me. I wouldn't have OFFERED CJ Gunn. Evaluation is done in practice. Again, those avgs are nil to me.

Absolutely

It's all relative!! They should have been sent packing! Same thing with holding onto JG a year too long!

His job is always on the line... coaching D1 sports is that cutthroat. This isn't middle school ball where everyone gets a shot. The bottom line--- CJ Gunn, at least, should have been told to take a hike LAST YEAR and then you should have filled the scholly. I don't even understand how you could argue against that. Either his evaluation sucks or his ability to develop sucks. Or at least it did last offseason. Couldn't be happier with the makeup of our roster currently.

Of course, until my job is on the line lol Evaluation is a massive part of coach's job.

No. Not at all. But again, that's the issue. We should have been in on, and SELLING, way more mins last off-season than we were. It was coaching malpractice to go into last season and think Cupps, Gunn, and Banks could play major mins.