Jump to content

2023 NFL Discussion


rico

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, dgambill said:

Those guys are replaceable…they are mostly expiring deals or a deal with 1 year left.  You will have to replace them anyways. So those picks will be used on protecting the new qb and building a young defense around him that is on the same timeline. Unless you think we keep everyone and still somehow land a franchise qb from the middle of the first round.

not sure All-Pros like Buckner and Gilmore are replaceable. 

Instead of signing an aging quarterback on the tail-end of his career, how would you feel about keeping the defense mostly intact and going all in on Lamar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Steubenhoosier said:

not sure All-Pros like Buckner and Gilmore are replaceable. 

Instead of signing an aging quarterback on the tail-end of his career, how would you feel about keeping the defense mostly intact and going all in on Lamar?

I would be all for this if it was even a remote possibility  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Steubenhoosier said:

not sure All-Pros like Buckner and Gilmore are replaceable. 

Instead of signing an aging quarterback on the tail-end of his career, how would you feel about keeping the defense mostly intact and going all in on Lamar?

No.  I would never get another Bengals game on Louisville TV again.  It's bad enough now when he plays for Baltimore, but it's a 50/50 split.  But, if he played for Indianapolis, it would be Colts every week.   

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, IU Scott said:

https://www.si.com/nfl/colts/news/peyton-manning-week-draft-manning-ryan-leaf 

This article said it bwas 50/50 in the Colts office. Said they polled 20 GM's and 14 said they would have taken Leaf

First it says half didn’t want Peyton then later it says all the coaches and the GM preferred Peyton. 14 unnamed GMs seem rather hard to believe nor do I think they were honest if this is true. Also given the number 1 spot they would have done the same due diligence that the Colts did and come to the same conclusion. Even if they picked Ryan they didn’t study the two closely because they had no chance to draft them. Anyways GMs are notorious for sending mixed messages around draft prospects…I’ve yet to hear a person go on the record and say he would have taken Ryan Leaf over Peyton…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Steubenhoosier said:

not sure All-Pros like Buckner and Gilmore are replaceable. 

Instead of signing an aging quarterback on the tail-end of his career, how would you feel about keeping the defense mostly intact and going all in on Lamar?

Trading everything for him? He isn’t a free agent…he can be tagged 3 years in a row just like Cousins did twice…Baltimore won’t let him walk. They will play the same game Washington did. I don’t think they trust he will stay healthy long term and be able to make the transition to a pocket passer…else they would have offered him the moon already. They will just do what teams do to running backs….ride them hard for 4-5 years…tag them once or twice and walk away once they are used up…rinse and repeat.

Edited by dgambill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Steubenhoosier said:

not sure All-Pros like Buckner and Gilmore are replaceable. 

Instead of signing an aging quarterback on the tail-end of his career, how would you feel about keeping the defense mostly intact and going all in on Lamar?

Also how did we acquire them? Seems it wasn’t too difficult…much easier so than acquiring an all pro qb in their prime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Steubenhoosier said:

So, basically gut the one unit of the team that is playing well? To take a chance that a franchise quarterback falls to you in the draft? And then go through the growing pains every rookie qb experiences?

No thanks 

So what’s your solution? We’ve tried to build a strong team around a veteran QB several times now and each year the results get worse. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 5fouls said:

They will likely need a Top 10 draft pick to do that.  

LOL  Heck they might need a Top 3.  I just feel that Levis is the best pro QB in the draft at present.  Now the Colts' slot might be aligned to get the kid from Florida.  He is getting some 1st round love from some of the experts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, dgambill said:

Trading everything for him? He isn’t a free agent…he can be tagged 3 years in a row just like Cousins did twice…Baltimore won’t let him walk. They will play the same game Washington did. I don’t think they trust he will stay healthy long term and be able to make the transition to a pocket passer…else they would have offered him the moon already. They will just do what teams do to running backs….ride them hard for 4-5 years…tag them once or twice and walk away once they are used up…rinse and repeat.

Lamar is a free agent at the end of this season. The Colts have built the defense to win now. The O-line isn't horrible. Needs an upgrade at LT and could use a guard. Kelly, Smith and Nelson are worth keeping. Create cap room to go after Lamar. If that doesn't work, use the money to fill the two line spots. Agree that there are a couple of guys that could be let go on defense, but not gutting it.

Drafting a rookie quarterback, and hoping he develops essentially wastes the effort in building the defense to where it is today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steubenhoosier said:

Lamar is a free agent at the end of this season. The Colts have built the defense to win now. The O-line isn't horrible. Needs an upgrade at LT and could use a guard. Kelly, Smith and Nelson are worth keeping. Create cap room to go after Lamar. If that doesn't work, use the money to fill the two line spots. Agree that there are a couple of guys that could be let go on defense, but not gutting it.

Drafting a rookie quarterback, and hoping he develops essentially wastes the effort in building the defense to where it is today.

There is almost a 0% chance Lamar Jackson hits free agency and a team gets him by just signing him. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Steubenhoosier said:

Money talks. If he is negotiating his own contract, as has been reported, he may be more open. Can't hurt to try. 

About a 99.9% chance he gets franchised.  .01 he signs a long term deal with anyone, actually.   Pretty  much the entire conversation  from start to finish.   Respectfully 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Steubenhoosier said:

Money talks. If he is negotiating his own contract, as has been reported, he may be more open. Can't hurt to try. 

As IUScott mentioned, the Ravens will surely franchise tag him.  I think I heard they have two years left of that option, but I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NotIThatLives said:

About a 99.9% chance he gets franchised.  .01 he signs a long term deal with anyone, actually.   Pretty  much the entire conversation  from start to finish.   Respectfully 

The only chance the Colts, or any team for that matter, have is that the Ravens move on from Lamar.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Steubenhoosier said:

Lamar is a free agent at the end of this season. The Colts have built the defense to win now. The O-line isn't horrible. Needs an upgrade at LT and could use a guard. Kelly, Smith and Nelson are worth keeping. Create cap room to go after Lamar. If that doesn't work, use the money to fill the two line spots. Agree that there are a couple of guys that could be let go on defense, but not gutting it.

Drafting a rookie quarterback, and hoping he develops essentially wastes the effort in building the defense to where it is today.

Lamar will get the franchise tag at least for two years if they can't settle on a contract extension. It just like with Cousins and Prescott

Edited by IU Scott
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...