Indykev Posted September 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2017 I said I was done with this. But if they put a rule in barring tampering, go for it. If you or anyone contacts a kid or a kid contacts you without the permission from his current school he can't go to your school and the player loses his one time free transfer without sitting a year. Coaches are complaining it will make their jobs harder, who cares, earn your millions.I don't think it will be a free for all after thinking about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FW_Hoosier Posted September 8, 2017 Report Share Posted September 8, 2017 7 hours ago, Indykev said: I said I was done with this. But if they put a rule in barring tampering, go for it. If you or anyone contacts a kid or a kid contacts you without the permission from his current school he can't go to your school and the player loses his one time free transfer without sitting a year. Coaches are complaining it will make their jobs harder, who cares, earn your millions.I don't think it will be a free for all after thinking about it. How would a tampering prohibition be enforced though? I agree it's a good idea, but it seems almost meaningless, especially considering how toothless the NCAA is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leathernecks Posted September 8, 2017 Report Share Posted September 8, 2017 I can't imagine tampering would be able to be enforced either. The coaches would just have boosters or people "not related to the program" do the recruiting of these guys for them. And if the coaches actually contacted the player, the only people who would know about it would be the coach and the transferring player and neither one of them would say anything to jeopardize it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indykev Posted September 12, 2017 Author Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.