Boiler Sam Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 1 hour ago, Steubenhoosier said: Read some of Boiler Sam’s comments If IU hoops was in year 6 of a regime, with no conference titles and 1 NCAA tournament win, would you be in favor of keeping the status quo? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billingsley99 Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 1 hour ago, Steubenhoosier said: Clearly no one decides, but anyone can state their pov. Frankly, not sure what brought you to this conversation because you really weren’t posting anything about the Colts game. I don’t care whether I am the favorite or least favorite poster here. I can take the jabs, but I won’t stop expressing my opinions. Sorry if they rub folks the wrong way. Neither will we even if dull and monotonous Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeking6 Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 40 minutes ago, Boiler Sam said: If IU hoops was in year 6 of a regime, with no conference titles and 1 NCAA tournament win, would you be in favor of keeping the status quo? Just to add to the craziness.....Purdue kept Painter on the job after year 7 on the job and didn't win a tourney game for 4 straight years after that. What say you? PS. Go Bears. To keep it line with thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgambill Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 5 hours ago, thirdgenhoosier said: It’s not that. It’s the people who say the same thing week after week. So your saying the Colts are like the Hoosiers under Archie…got it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgambill Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 (edited) 4 hours ago, 5fouls said: The Lions are a fun team to watch. They have a great chance to really do something special. Multiple first rd picks. Could easily take a couple difference makers on defense. Could be scary good. I keep seeing Meyers mocked to them. I’m sorry but with all the weapons on offense last thing they need is to spend a 1st on a TE. If that was the case why trade their starter if they didn’t think what they have to replace is adequate. Question is do they stick with Goff or draft a qb? Man that is tough….I don’t think I would try to spend a fortune to move up but if one fell in my lap…be hard to say no. Could easily let them sit a year and roll with Goff for one more to see how it goes. He is a perfect bridge qb. Edited January 2, 2023 by dgambill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thirdgenhoosier Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 4 minutes ago, dgambill said: So your saying the Colts are like the Hoosiers under Archie…got it. Uh, no. I’m not saying anything about either team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgambill Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 Just now, thirdgenhoosier said: Uh, no. I’m not saying anything about either team. Sorry it was kinda sarcasm…I should have lol ed. I remember similar complaints about criticism of Archie even after it became clear we weren’t going anywhere under his leadership. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgambill Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 So I see no way we don’t win next week. Zero. Houston won’t risk losing the #1 pick to win. Saturday wants the job bad so he won’t try to lose. I mean how crazy if we did try to tank…I mean I could see a legit 0-0 tie lol. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thirdgenhoosier Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 (edited) 10 minutes ago, dgambill said: Sorry it was kinda sarcasm…I should have lol ed. I remember similar complaints about criticism of Archie even after it became clear we weren’t going anywhere under his leadership. Ah, gotcha. All is good! The good news is a change of coach has already happened. Now we see what happens next. Edited January 2, 2023 by thirdgenhoosier 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bronkonagurski Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 5 hours ago, IU Scott said: To me there isn't much difference for the Bears to have the first or second pick. You won't be picking a QB and the Texans will so the Bears will still have their pick of the best players available. If you have the first pick the best thing to do is probably trade out of that pick and get more assets. The difference is having the opportunity to trade for more assets, that is the reason I'd prefer the top pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotIThatLives Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 9 hours ago, dgambill said: So I see no way we don’t win next week. Zero. Houston won’t risk losing the #1 pick to win. Saturday wants the job bad so he won’t try to lose. I mean how crazy if we did try to tank…I mean I could see a legit 0-0 tie lol. So what are the implications for this week alone for the Colts pick? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thirdgenhoosier Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 22 minutes ago, NotIThatLives said: So what are the implications for this week alone for the Colts pick? I think the Colts could land anywhere between the 2nd and 6th pick. But three teams around the Colts (Rams, Cardinals, Bears) are all playing against teams that still have something on the line. Maybe Denver does as well, but I’m not really sure. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeking6 Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 After watching the Colts this year. I understand the idea behind trading back and gathering picks but on the other hand don't make this difficult. Go get Stroud and figure it out from there. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btownqb Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 27 minutes ago, Seeking6 said: After watching the Colts this year. I understand the idea behind trading back and gathering picks but on the other hand don't make this difficult. Go get Stroud and figure it out from there. I think we will have to get to #2 to take him. Which is fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted January 2, 2023 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 Broncos interested in Harbaugh: https://www.profootballrumors.com/2023/01/broncos-interested-in-interviewing-jim-harbaugh-for-hc-vacancy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeking6 Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 3 minutes ago, btownqb said: I think we will have to get to #2 to take him. Which is fine. Houston-Young Bears-Carter or Williams or trade back Seattle-Carter or Williams Arizona-not drafting QB Colts-Stroud Lions and Raiders are likely at 6 and 7 so I guess they could move up. If I'm the Colts though I get Stroud. Just like what Fields did vs Clemson in national semis with broken ribs.....Stroud tore up a team with about 25 pros on it. I don't make this anymore difficult than it needs to be. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoB2011 Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 10 hours ago, dgambill said: They have a great chance to really do something special. Multiple first rd picks. Could easily take a couple difference makers on defense. Could be scary good. I keep seeing Meyers mocked to them. I’m sorry but with all the weapons on offense last thing they need is to spend a 1st on a TE. If that was the case why trade their starter if they didn’t think what they have to replace is adequate. Question is do they stick with Goff or draft a qb? Man that is tough….I don’t think I would try to spend a fortune to move up but if one fell in my lap…be hard to say no. Could easily let them sit a year and roll with Goff for one more to see how it goes. He is a perfect bridge qb. If I’m the Lions, I take defense with the Rams pick and potentially taking a QB with their pick that can sit behind Goff. But it would strongly depend on who is available there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btownqb Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 Just now, Seeking6 said: Houston-Young Bears-Carter or Williams or trade back Seattle-Carter or Williams Arizona-not drafting QB Colts-Stroud Lions and Raiders are likely at 6 and 7 so I guess they could move up. If I'm the Colts though I get Stroud. Just like what Fields did vs Clemson in national semis with broken ribs.....Stroud tore up a team with about 25 pros on it. I don't make this anymore difficult than it needs to be. I don't think thats how the top 4 will go. Jmo Young...... then someone trades for No. 2. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btownqb Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 40 minutes ago, thirdgenhoosier said: I think the Colts could land anywhere between the 2nd and 6th pick. But three teams around the Colts (Rams, Cardinals, Bears) are all playing against teams that still have something on the line. Maybe Denver does as well, but I’m not really sure. 3 straight weeks the Cards blew one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btownqb Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 Bears and Seattle would be stupid not to trade back... assuming SEA doesn't want a QB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeking6 Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 3 minutes ago, btownqb said: I don't think thats how the top 4 will go. Jmo Young...... then someone trades for No. 2. It most definitely won't go the way we as fans see it. Someone will always trade up and blow the whole thing up....but whoever is sitting at number 2 and doesn't need a QB has the ability for biggest haul. Shoot I'd trade my Bears 2nd pick for Davante Adams right now and call the draft a success. Haha. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoB2011 Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 13 minutes ago, btownqb said: I think we will have to get to #2 to take him. Which is fine. I don’t think so, but if the Bears to risk not getting a generational talent on defense that would be on brand. The two best players in the draft are defenders, I don’t see QB going the top two picks. Houston will probably take Young one because of need, but Carter and Anderson are too good to pass for the teams at 2 and 3. The risk would be the Cardinals at 4 trading back and someone moving in there IMO. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boiler Sam Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 4 minutes ago, btownqb said: I don't think thats how the top 4 will go. Jmo Young...... then someone trades for No. 2. Yup. Bears auction off the 2 to the highest bidder. 3 number 1s, plus other picks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoB2011 Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 8 minutes ago, btownqb said: I don't think thats how the top 4 will go. Jmo Young...... then someone trades for No. 2. Why would the Bears risk not getting Carter or Anderson though? You’ve said several times how hard it is to get players of that caliber on the defensive line in defense of the Colts not having one, now you’re saying a team will pass on players like that? Those are two of the best defensive prospects we’ve had in a while. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btownqb Posted January 2, 2023 Report Share Posted January 2, 2023 2 minutes ago, KoB2011 said: I don’t think so, but if the Bears to risk not getting a generational talent on defense that would be on brand. The two best players in the draft are defenders, I don’t see QB going the top two picks. Houston will probably take Young one because of need, but Carter and Anderson are too good to pass for the teams at 2 and 3. The risk would be the Cardinals at 4 trading back and someone moving in there IMO. Ok.. so then trade for the 3rd pick. If the Cards are the worry... you have to be 2nd or 3rd to pick ahead of them... I think QB2 is taken before pick 5. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.