Jump to content

btownqb

Members
  • Posts

    26,341
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    207

Everything posted by btownqb

  1. Well, like I said, it was skewed because of those two 33 min games. "down the stretch" Trey didn't play until the BTT. TG cut into Parker's mins pretty substantially and I think TG and RP would have cut into MK's mins a little more if they would have been healthy. Someone had to play on the wing lol Basically.. from Ohio State at home to Illinois during the B1G season he avged 20mpg exactly. Then we had more injuries and I don't think the rotations ever got back to what we truly wanted them to be for a # of reasons. 6-2 in that stretch.
  2. That sucks haha We did some nacho burgers (cayenne pepper/dominant one/garlic powder on the burger, along with grilled onions and jalapenos, tortilla chips, salsa and some sharp cheddar), veggies, baked potato, and grilled shrimp. I like smoking pork loins a lot. Seems simple. Chicken wings I smoked for awhile and finish on the grill. Seems to work for us.
  3. Yes, UW at home. If Galloway was healthy the whole time he was basically going to move Parker to no mins. I've mentioned this... there is simply no way TG was ever where he needed to be conditioning wise. There is just no way, especially with the groin late.
  4. There is more to it then JUST when they were healthy vs. being healthy, in game shape, etc. Ya know? But anyways, 25.1mpg in the games that those other two played. 23.3mpg in the 9 games that weren't Michigan and Iowa. He played 33mins in those games, obviously they skew the avg a bit.
  5. Those #s are 100% fine for everything else we have talent wise and what else he brings to the table.
  6. We have solved our biggest problem which was not enough guys being able to break the defense down off the dribble. We can develop shooting.
  7. Sorry, that was in reference to the state's talent not panning out. I think we misidentified/didn't develop way more then the state not producing the talent. Desmond Bane would have solved some problems.
  8. If we add Dennis we are better to immensely better on the wing.
  9. https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/schools/louisville/2013.html It can be done. Louisville shot 31% from 3 in conference play that year. Idk what to tell you inregards to Archie. He sucked.
  10. So do I. As far as I know.. the only thing he has said is TJD is getting a big NIL deal?
  11. Was that available more to him because the other players on his team demanded more attention? I only watched 2 UNC games all year. I don't know.
  12. No, that is absolutely complete speculation, at this point. All of this is, I reckon.
  13. So don't let them pack the hell out of the paint... you dribble drive people to death, you cut better, you get the ball up the court in transition and on made buckets... with wings that can attack and distribute... you get to the foul line more. Essentially, all of our FTs were taken by 3 guys.
  14. But we don't need anywhere near all of that to happen to be a lot better. We can get sooo many more simple buckets by simply being better-- Dennis, JHS, TB, TG, and MK on the wings then what we had last year.
  15. All I'm saying is... our 3pt shooting wasn't the only problem, offensively. Truthfully, imo, I believe lack of guys that can break you down off the dribble was an even bigger problem. Again.. an opinion.
  16. We are top 15 if we get Dennis and TJD. UNC shooting #s look no different then ours when you take out Manek, Houstons were down right awful. This wasn't going to be fixed in one year. And I think style of play and player development are pretty well going fix our shooting owes, as much as anything else. We don't have to be an elite shooting team.. we just have to be a little better. Literally just a little.
  17. They'll be fine. Portal needs to go back to sitting out a year, though, imo.
  18. Was there a route for us to win a championship in year 2?
×
×
  • Create New...