rico Posted August 14, 2021 Report Share Posted August 14, 2021 Don't know if anybody has seen this or seen it mentioned... https://theathletic.com/2764906/2021/08/12/realignment-gets-weird-the-athletic-drafts-new-mens-college-basketball-conferences/ It is behind a paywall but someone on another site posted the results. I guess the premise is selecting(drafting) teams for basketball conferences. Here it is with the overall selection in parenthesis: #1's Kansas (1) Duke (2) North Carolina (3) Kentucky (4) Michigan (5) Gonzaga (6) #2's Indiana (12) UConn (11) Virginia (10) Louisville (9) Michigan State (8) Villanova (7) #3's UCLA (13) Baylor (14) Alabama (15) Ohio State (16) Oregon (17) Syracuse (18) #4's Illinois (24) Arizona (23) Florida State (22) Purdue (21) Maryland (20) Memphis (19) #5's Texas (25) Tennessee (26) Penn State (27) Wisconsin (28) Arkansas (29) USC (30) #6's UNLV (36) Stanford (35) Notre Dame (34) Xavier (33) West Virginia (32) Butler (31) #7's San Diego State (37) Oklahoma (38) Georgetown (39) Cincinnati (40) Loyola Chicago (41) Marquette (42) #8's Iowa State (48) BYU (47) Virginia Tech (46) Oklahoma State (45) Creighton (44) Wichita State (43) #9's Iowa (49) Florida (50) Auburn (51) Houston (52) Arizona State (53) Seton Hall (54) #10's Texas Tech (60) Missouri (59) LSU (58) Pittsburgh (57) VCU (56) Washington (55) #11's Minnesota (61) South Carolina (62) NC State (63) Colorado (64) Dayton (65) Utah (66) #12's New Mexico (72) Vermont (71) Rutgers (70) DePaul (69) St. John's (68) Saint Mary's (67) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IUFLA Posted August 14, 2021 Report Share Posted August 14, 2021 Are they talking historically, currently, or some combination of the two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zlinedavid Posted August 14, 2021 Report Share Posted August 14, 2021 21 minutes ago, IUFLA said: Are they talking historically, currently, or some combination of the two? Some weird combination of the two apparently. UCLA has had more recent success and historic success than us, but they’re below us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted August 14, 2021 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2021 22 minutes ago, IUFLA said: Are they talking historically, currently, or some combination of the two? That I do not know...I can't read the article myself. Was hoping someone here had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IUFLA Posted August 14, 2021 Report Share Posted August 14, 2021 31 minutes ago, Zlinedavid said: Some weird combination of the two apparently. UCLA has had more recent success and historic success than us, but they’re below us. If it's currently, I think IU is too high...historically, too low... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted August 14, 2021 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2021 25 minutes ago, IUFLA said: If it's currently, I think IU is too high...historically, too low... How about DePaul and St. John's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IUFLA Posted August 14, 2021 Report Share Posted August 14, 2021 45 minutes ago, rico said: How about DePaul and St. John's? I don't know but I'd definitely like to see the formula/methodology... From what I see I think it somewhat involves a hat and slips of paper... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluegrassIU Posted August 15, 2021 Report Share Posted August 15, 2021 On 8/14/2021 at 9:00 AM, rico said: That I do not know...I can't read the article myself. Was hoping someone here had. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5fouls Posted August 16, 2021 Report Share Posted August 16, 2021 On 8/14/2021 at 9:32 AM, rico said: Don't know if anybody has seen this or seen it mentioned... https://theathletic.com/2764906/2021/08/12/realignment-gets-weird-the-athletic-drafts-new-mens-college-basketball-conferences/ It is behind a paywall but someone on another site posted the results. I guess the premise is selecting(drafting) teams for basketball conferences. Here it is with the overall selection in parenthesis: #1's Kansas (1) Duke (2) North Carolina (3) Kentucky (4) Michigan (5) Gonzaga (6) #2's Indiana (12) UConn (11) Virginia (10) Louisville (9) Michigan State (8) Villanova (7) #3's UCLA (13) Baylor (14) Alabama (15) Ohio State (16) Oregon (17) Syracuse (18) #4's Illinois (24) Arizona (23) Florida State (22) Purdue (21) Maryland (20) Memphis (19) #5's Texas (25) Tennessee (26) Penn State (27) Wisconsin (28) Arkansas (29) USC (30) #6's UNLV (36) Stanford (35) Notre Dame (34) Xavier (33) West Virginia (32) Butler (31) #7's San Diego State (37) Oklahoma (38) Georgetown (39) Cincinnati (40) Loyola Chicago (41) Marquette (42) #8's Iowa State (48) BYU (47) Virginia Tech (46) Oklahoma State (45) Creighton (44) Wichita State (43) #9's Iowa (49) Florida (50) Auburn (51) Houston (52) Arizona State (53) Seton Hall (54) #10's Texas Tech (60) Missouri (59) LSU (58) Pittsburgh (57) VCU (56) Washington (55) #11's Minnesota (61) South Carolina (62) NC State (63) Colorado (64) Dayton (65) Utah (66) #12's New Mexico (72) Vermont (71) Rutgers (70) DePaul (69) St. John's (68) Saint Mary's (67) If I was a betting man.....wait, I am. Anyway, I have a feeling that the author is an alum, a fan, or on the faculty of Loyola Chicago. Does anyone seriously rthink they will continue to have big time success without Moser, and more importantly, Krutwig? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted August 16, 2021 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2021 10 hours ago, 5fouls said: If I was a betting man.....wait, I am. Anyway, I have a feeling that the author is an alum, a fan, or on the faculty of Loyola Chicago. Does anyone seriously rthink they will continue to have big time success without Moser, and more importantly, Krutwig? 6 of their writers voted on this. And yes, there are some eyebrow raisers in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.