Jump to content

FKIM01

Members
  • Posts

    10,753
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

Posts posted by FKIM01

  1. Gotta quit reading this thread.  It's absolutely exhausting...

    image.gif.fbbd5cb94ec3e606d764958ed54c6885.gif

    ...and the "buying a team" talk needs to go away.  How many teams did UCLA, Duke, Kensucky, Kansas, etc. buy in the past?  I guess John Wooden sucks as a coach too.  Michigan bought the Fab 5.  At least today it happens legally.  I don't like how stupid the NIL has made the game, but it's the current rule to live by.  Everyone can now "buy a team", so that criticism needs to stop.

    • Like 3
  2. 23 hours ago, 5fouls said:

    Lol at the about face regarding use of the 13th scholly.  

    Can't speak for others but I have no problem banking it for now, rather than adding a project.  If you give it to a quality contributor, fine, but I think it's silly to fill it with a project that only gets mop-up minutes. 12 plus walk-ons is plenty to run practice.  Hemenway seems a reasonable use if he wants it, but that puts IU in a position of needing to fill the 13th with a front court player to backup Ballo/Reneau.

    That's a long winded way of saying IU is now in a position where the staff can be choosy if they want.

    • Like 2
  3. 4 minutes ago, Parakeet Jones said:

    Two things can be simultaneously true. You can hate the NIL/portal landscape AND be happy IU is taking full advantage of it.   I identify with both of those positions. 
     

    I read this somewhere and have stole it and posted it many times. You can build a team through the portal, but you can’t build a program through the portal. We seem to have built a team this offseason, I just hope it translates into building a program. 

    Great post.  I'm right there with you.  I absolutely hate the NIL and the farce it makes of amateur sports, but since it's not going away, I'm at least appreciative of how it's leveled the playing field and taken away the biggest cheating element in college sports.  I find it laughable that the NCAA has a tampering "rule" that appears even less effective than the pro version.

    Now, all that's left is to eliminate the requirement for the athletes to attend classes.  Let the ones go that want to and let the rest stay in the gym.  If you require ANY class,it should be of the personal finance variety.  Help these kids hang onto the money they make and otherwise, let them learn their sport.  It's silly to pretend that most of these elite athletes have any interest in the classroom. Eventually,  I could see teams only affiliated to schools via sponsorship.

  4. 22 minutes ago, 13th&Jackson said:

    Officially announced today but apparently both parties knew all season he wouldn't return. 

    “A.J. is looking to make a pro career,” Izzo said last week on Staudt on Sports on AM-730 in Lansing. “But he could go back to college; it wouldn’t be here. We have some younger guys and he has exhausted his (eligibility) and he’ll graduate. But I think he’d like to get into pro ball whether it be Europe, whether it be the G League. But nowadays everybody will look at college, too, depending on offers from different places.”

    He's not exhausted his eligibility if he's in the transfer portal, Tom...

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  5. 20 minutes ago, OGIUAndy said:

    I agree otherwise we could have just rolled with Sparks again. They seem like similar types of players. Decent offense and rebounding, not athletic, not good FT shooters. I'd rather just have an all defensive type guy. But I also don't know who's interested. 

    I figured it was Sparks decision to leave?  Assume he's looking for more minutes.

×
×
  • Create New...