Jump to content

FKIM01

Members
  • Posts

    10,737
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

Posts posted by FKIM01

  1. 2 hours ago, Hoosier82 said:

    Surprised (pleasantly) to see KC already projected as a mid 1st rounder in the 2025 draft…well ahead of highly coveted guys like Storr, K Knox, Bradshaw, etc  

    https://www.nbadraft.net/nba-mock-drafts/?year-mock=2025

     

    I also see #2 & #3.  Hope that experiment crashes and burns and Nutgers sucks for the next hundred years.  That's how little I think of the douchebag Harper family.

    • Like 1
  2. 4 hours ago, tdhoosier said:

    I only feel better about Goode than Essegian because of the big family connections to IU. His dad and uncle played FB at IU. His brother attends IU right now. His parents apparently have season tix for basketball. And most importantly he wants to attend a business grad school. 

    But other than that I know nothing - I'm just sitting back and eating popcorn like the rest of us.  

     

    Has he scheduled any visit beyond IU this Thursday and Friday?  That would indicate something...

  3. 1 minute ago, iuswingman said:

    If Goode is strictly a 3, then wonder if MM will end up slotting at the 4 some.    Then you also have Tucker but he could probably fill in at a few positions.

    I'm hoping our backup 4 does open things up with outside shooting regardless of whether he is called a wing or big.

    If IU has all three of those guys, then yeah...no doubt some or all of them log significant minutes as a second wing defending a 4.  I could see Mgbako or Goode pulling that off.  My suspicion is that Tucker would need more time in the weight room before covering most college 4's.

    Goode fits because he has enough experience to cover a 4 at least for a few minutes each game, particularly if you have a 7-foot rim protector backing him up.

  4. 6 minutes ago, Kdug said:

    I think pairing him at the 4 with Ballo would actually be a pretty effective lineup. The weaknesses would be rebounding and post defense, which are already weaknesses with Reneau at the 4 anyway. It’d also provide more space for Ballo down low and Rice, Carlyle, and Galloway to attack the rim. 

    Sure, in spots.  As you said, the defense is a concern so I wouldn't want to run that lineup more than maybe 10-15 minutes unless it is really working well, perhaps against a smaller lineup on the other side.

    • Like 1
  5. 17 minutes ago, btownqb said:

    Kopp played the 4 in the BTT, when we made a run, in CMWs first year. It looked great. 

    Sorry went and checked.  It was pretty much just the ILL game in the tourney. 

    I could see it in spots, especially when you need to draw defenders out of the land, but I sure wouldn't want to start a Kopp/Goode at the 4 in the Big Ten.  I could see on occasion, running two wings and two guards and keeping someone like Ballo back under the rim.  That would certainly provide a nice change of pace and make some space for shooters.

    • Like 1
  6. Back at the subject, Goode would slot nicely into the current roster.  Would be tough for me seeing him play the 4 unless you're temporarily going small.  Looks like a natural 3 to me.  I don't remember Miller Kopp being a real effective 4 in IU's system.

    I hate the idea of waiting a whole week to resolve this one, but I guess there are enough open spots to give him a week.  Just seems silly when he likely already knows.

    • Like 3
  7. 3 minutes ago, Zlinedavid said:

    They were in the program for one year prior to the start of last season, and sat behind 4 viable backcourt options.  I'm not saying they should have stayed.  In fact I think them transferring was the right move.  What I'm saying is that going into last season, they weren't the disasters they turned out to be.  They were much more unknown. 

    Yeah, the sample size was considerably larger after year two to make the call...and obviously, the call was made.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...