Its pretty clear the other teams are still willing to gamble with others beating them and not MK. If I was building a scouting report.. MK isn't the guy we are going to lose.
I've lost a fair amount of confidence in Tamar since I bragged on him earlier in the year.
You can play 4 on 4 vs us and just say "MK gets nothing"... with Race and X out. That was my point. The shooting has undoubtedly improved.
You aren't getting 5 good looks a game off set plays in D1 basketball, imo, for someone like MK.
Especially not when you don't have enough other threats.
My statement was a general comment. I have no issue with Miller getting more, good looks. He's shooting 45% from 3.
I don't consider that running offense through someone.
And, the bottom line... there's a serious scouting report on Indiana.
If you were another teams coach... would you ever allow MK to get an open 3... knowing the offensive capabilities (or lack there of) of the others on our team?
I like him.. and the whole WR core, in general.
McCulley, Camper, Cooper, Williams, Coby, Perry, Smith, Carter. I'm really excited for this group.
Cooper, McCulley, Perry.. I think will catch a lot of screens.
I agreed he was their "brightest" spot. But his team scored 45pts, it wasn't much of an advantage. 🤷♂️
If Tamar Bates went 4-13 and we lost by 18 on the road, there isn't anyone that would mention how well he played.
And that wasn't the point I was trying to make anyway. This staff had to tell CJ Gunn to get lost in order to recruit/have room for CE. That clearly wasn't going to happen.
Plus Connor was smart in identifying UW as somewhere he could play immediately.