Jump to content

ledies22

Members
  • Posts

    1,688
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by ledies22

  1. Yah… im not sure how that works out, but if a shitty product makes that kinda money…. Why not lol
  2. seems like they are doing okay. The IU Bloomington football program paid out $29,373,452 in expenses while making $56,453,582 in total revenue. This means the program turned a profit, making $27,080,130 for the school. This is great since many college sports programs lose money. https://www.collegefactual.com/colleges/indiana-university-bloomington/student-life/sports/#google_vignette
  3. i read somewhere IU never really pursued her.
  4. wasnt this the one that said he wanted to be committed prior to high school season?
  5. i think thats what was precisely discussed. Sheyer will continue to recruit well on the coat tails of K and the Duke brand. The discussion was what can he do with the talent. if he has 3-4 years bounced out in round of 32, i dont think recruiting will be his only problem. FWIW, i dont think that to be the case.
  6. I hope so. You’re not going to get 13 5 star kids to eat all the schollies
  7. from Virginia listed as a SF 6'7" 185lbs. 4 star 75-80 range slew of P5 offers: Maryland, Cal, FSU, Illinois, Iowa, MSU to name a few.
  8. I think part of it has to do with his relationships he has built within the state of Indiana as an assistant within the state for so many years.
  9. such a weird thing to wade thru these days. How much stock and effort do you want to put into a 4 year guy like this, or even a 3 star when we are after top 50 kids or higher that may (probably) not stick around for 4 years. Glad it's not my job and i can sit back and complain about everything on the couch picking potato chips out of my belly button
  10. dont want to turn this into a queen thread, but i dont know if you can say that yet. I think Queen is a better rated recruit than TJD was.
  11. Sarver ‘27 minutes left in second half IU 1-0
  12. That was an incomplete pass…. Barely. announcers are 🗑️. Keep bringing up a nonexistent targeting play. team looks pretty good. gotta call some ballsy plays and make some ballsy decisions to pull off this kind of upset. Onside kick, launch it on 1st down, punt on first. Whatever. Don’t get brownies by losing by less than you’re supposed to.
  13. Fine…. I’ll post it. Lost 1-0 Next game Monday Seton Hall
  14. IU slipped back in the rankings a bit to #10. They play Washington who is at the bottom of the top 25. 8pm tonight.
  15. Cubs call up P Shane Greene and OF Alex Canario
  16. I dont want to wait til february to win the lotto. I want to win it now and put it all on the Dolphins
  17. Sorry if i am wrong on this, but i think you're one of the people that get upset when people post in absolutes and that IU is getting a recruit and turns out to be wrong. No?
  18. I know how averages work. Thanks for the lesson though. If you really want to be nit picky, that's the NBA average. Some teams pass less and some teams pass more. Also that average takes in account of possessions that passes get stolen on the first pass. and a possession that an offensive rebound occurs elongating the possession. 😲
  19. Cubbies take 2 of 3 from the Brewers. On to the Reds as the brewers go home to take on the Phillies.
  20. You're the one who brought up tempo and conveniently tried to frame it. I just dug deeper into it with the efficiency vs tempo. 15 of your top 25 best off. efficient teams are ranked 100 or worse in tempo. National Champs were 204. for the second portion I was comparing the top 100 tempo teams vs how they were ranked last year, which i would say is relevant to the conversation. pretty glaring that only 8 teams that ended up in the top 25 rankings last year were in the top 100 in tempo. tempo=speed. speed=less time. less time is what we are talking about. It seems like speeding up the game does not correlate to the best teams in college basketball. Or at least 17 of the top 25 Ultimately does the 6 seconds really matter? Not sure. probably not to a significant degree in terms of what has been brought up. I hate the NBA. The product of a 24 second shot clock is dribble the ball up the floor. Pass it once. Twice sometimes Maybe a third time and a shot. This is the one thing i am absolutely against, as this is the one rule that would inch CBB toward the NBA the closest.
  21. I sat at the bar and had the app open for the duration switching between which games had my attention depending on who was on offense or in the redzone for the first slate of games anyway
×
×
  • Create New...