Jump to content

Around the B1G/NCAA


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 minutes ago, rico said:

At the half...Notre Dame 52  GaTech 32

Pastner has to be on the hot seat. Never thought that was a good fit. He was trending down at Memphis and you can't recruit the same players to GT.

They need a system coach that can win with smart players, but not top 100 athletes, similar to how Paul Johnson ran the football program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 13th&Jackson said:

Pastner has to be on the hot seat. Never thought that was a good fit. He was trending down at Memphis and you can't recruit the same players to GT.

They need a system coach that can win with smart players, but not top 100 athletes, similar to how Paul Johnson ran the football program.

Pastner, IMO, is living on borrowed time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, IU Scott said:

I realize that but why hire Pastner with no HC experience.

What are you talking about?  Pastner, worked under Cal.  When Cal left Josh was named the HC at Memphis.  His record with the Tigers was 167-73 in 7 years with four NCAAT appearances.  He was successful there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rico said:

What are you talking about?  Pastner, worked under Cal.  When Cal left Josh was named the HC at Memphis.  His record with the Tigers was 167-73 in 7 years with four NCAAT appearances.  He was successful there.  

was never impressed with him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, rico said:

What are you talking about?  Pastner, worked under Cal.  When Cal left Josh was named the HC at Memphis.  His record with the Tigers was 167-73 in 7 years with four NCAAT appearances.  He was successful there.  

Pastner at GT is a bad combination of "pretty goods".  Pastner is a pretty good coach.  Not great, not terrible.  GT is a pretty good program.  Not super elite, but not terrible either.

The problem is that they're up against the biggest name programs in college basketball: Duke, UNC, NC State, Syracuse, Louisville, etc.  Pastner at Memphis was at the helm of one of the better programs in the AAC, and his results reflected that.  Put him in a much tougher league in a program that's only equal in prestige to the one he left, and you're seeing the outcome. 

GT also suffers from the same phantom issue that Illinois does.  Atlanta produces a ton of talent, so one would think that the program that's in the city would have an advantage.  GT doesn't carry that kind of weight though, and everyone forgets that the top level talent in Atlanta is being inundated with information from every major program in the country.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Zlinedavid said:

Pastner at GT is a bad combination of "pretty goods".  Pastner is a pretty good coach.  Not great, not terrible.  GT is a pretty good program.  Not super elite, but not terrible either.

The problem is that they're up against the biggest name programs in college basketball: Duke, UNC, NC State, Syracuse, Louisville, etc.  Pastner at Memphis was at the helm of one of the better programs in the AAC, and his results reflected that.  Put him in a much tougher league in a program that's only equal in prestige to the one he left, and you're seeing the outcome. 

GT also suffers from the same phantom issue that Illinois does.  Atlanta produces a ton of talent, so one would think that the program that's in the city would have an advantage.  GT doesn't carry that kind of weight though, and everyone forgets that the top level talent in Atlanta is being inundated with information from every major program in the country.  

I took Scott's post as saying why Tech would hire a HC without any head coaching experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, rico said:

That's fine....but he was a winner at Memphis.  Evidently Lute and Cal thought a lot of him.

He was the ACC coach of the year in 2017. Beat UNC and Virginia both that year...at a school like Georgia tech with no basketball history and below avg talent. That’s impressive. Didn’t they knock us out of the NIT that year?? Anyways that’s a tough place to coach...should be more like why did he take a job there not why did they hire him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dgambill said:

He was the ACC coach of the year in 2017. Beat UNC and Virginia both that year...at a school like Georgia tech with no basketball history and below avg talent. That’s impressive. Didn’t they knock us out of the NIT that year?? Anyways that’s a tough place to coach...should be more like why did he take a job there not why did they hire him.

Georgia Tech was a power in the ACC form 85-92

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, IU Scott said:

Georgia Tech was a power in the ACC form 85-92

That was over 30 years ago...before Pastner was almost born.

Scott your old! Don’t get me wrong I am getting there too but if Stephon Marberry was your last good team then that is a long time ago!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dgambill said:

That was over 30 years ago...before Pastner was almost born.

Scott your old! Don’t get me wrong I am getting there too but if Stephon Marberry was your last good team then that is a long time ago!!!

I am older than Scott......sigh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 13th&Jackson said:

Pastner has to be on the hot seat. Never thought that was a good fit. He was trending down at Memphis and you can't recruit the same players to GT.

They need a system coach that can win with smart players, but not top 100 athletes, similar to how Paul Johnson ran the football program.

Isn't this just his 2nd year? Results have stunk no doubt but good luck hiring a coach if all you get is two years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...