HoosierDPU95

But is he a "shooter"?

3 fingers of Buffalo Trace for me.

An open spot this year is a little different than last year but they are related. Last season was 100% just negligence. This year it should have already been filled with an incoming Freshman but we started the off-season with 0 recruits (more negligence). I think it will be super difficult to find a transfer who would agree to come fill a spot that projects to have 0 minutes. I'm very excited about who is coming in and give the staff all the credit for working to right the ship.. but I have yet to hear any acceptable excuse for that open spot last year. Just my opinion of course.

So... are some really complaining about the staff flying to visit these recruits? WTF? It's not like they're visiting Avon or Greencastle for Pete's sake.

We played for money in ours. For the offertory of course 😉

And just like a Purdue championship run, this thread has derailed.

Show him a montage of MR's silly fouls. Best way to assure him that there are plenty of minutes to be had

But is he a shooter? 😉

It feels quiet here. Should we talk about something to pass the time? Perhaps a topic we haven't touched on much like "do you think we need shooters" or "what defines a 'shooter'"?

so odd... I'm listening to this and have an overwhelming craving for a party size bag of doritos...

Also need to think about what these "bench" guys will bring to practice and how that can help the starters improve. A big body that can stretch the floor will force Ballo to work on his D for example.

Can we get this thread back on topic now? ... automotive window cleaning tips

Look's like Woodson's knee replacement was a huge success.

this is what that thread would look like for me

This is a tricky one. Ballo seems to be the kind of player that is worth waiting for.

Having no access to newspaper for many years now, I've found this stuff with paper towels works wonders

This probably should go in a different thread but I'm not sure which one. The term "shooter" has come up a lot in this thread though so I'll post here. What are folks thinking with statements like "he's not a shooter" or "we need shooters"? Are folks wanting/expecting someone like Hulls where the player has one job and that is to knock down 3's at a +40% with defense, rebounding, driving the ball, etc. being optional? or Are folks wanting/expecting someone like Mark Sears that shoots +50% from the field +40% from 3, +80% from the line and can also kill you off the dribble, play D and rebound? or Are folks wanting/expecting something in between? I'm not making a case one way or the other for what "shooter" should mean here, I'm just trying to understand what other's are wanting/expecting.

w They could let Bill design the alternate uniforms

Any chance Cyril could be one of those TBDs?

We land both those guys I'll do a little boogie

My approach of picking the bracket based on how miserable I would feel with the outcome almost came back to bite me. Would have finished first had PU won. Ended up 22nd. I've never been happier with such a crappy finish :-).

BINGO! IU runs that weave at the top but we don't have the guys that are both threats to drive and shoot the 3 like UConn. PU came out committed to keeping UConn from taking the 3 and dropping Edey to protect the paint. UConn burned them from the elbow (much like JHS did) and that opened up the paint and the 3-point line. NCState did similar but just didn't have enough guys that could make shots

Just like the Women's final.