Jump to content

HoosierDPU95

Members
  • Posts

    547
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HoosierDPU95

  1. 1 hour ago, IUFLA said:

    Nice article on Luke by our friend, @The Daily Hoosier

    Interesting stat...

    "For his three-year college career, Goode has made 38.8% of his three-point shots on 219 attempts. He has only attempted 46 two-pointers during his college career.  He’s been even better from long range against top competition. According to KenPom, he’s shot 41.2% from three against Tier A (top-50) opponents, including 42.9% (on 63 attempts) this year."

    Chevy Chase - Imgflip

    But is he a "shooter"?

    • Haha 1
  2. 1 minute ago, btownqb said:

    Mmm ok. 

    Then I don't EVER want to hear anything about youth, injuries, anything of that nature again. 

    I think its 100% malpractice to not fill every scholly. I also find it unimaginable after last season. 

    An open spot this year is a little different than last year but they are related. Last season was 100% just negligence. This year it should have already been filled with an incoming Freshman but we started the off-season with 0 recruits (more negligence). I think it will be super difficult to find a transfer who would agree to come fill a spot that projects to have 0 minutes. I'm very excited about who is coming in and give the staff all the credit for working to right the ship.. but I have yet to hear any acceptable excuse for that open spot last year. 

    Just my opinion of course.

     

    • Like 2
  3. On 4/15/2024 at 2:08 PM, DWB said:

    Can you do the same thing with a “all things Purdue thread?” Seems like more threads get hijacked by the 2-3 PU posters and replies than those posting about Woodson. Gotten to a point where you can,t read anything on here anymore without suffering thru a bunch of drivill on PU.

    this is what that thread would look like for me

    image.png.28c7037531b1c449c8fea8d81867801d.png

    • Like 1
    • Haha 3
  4. This probably should go in a different thread but I'm not sure which one. The term "shooter" has come up a lot in this thread though so I'll post here. What are folks thinking with statements like "he's not a shooter" or "we need shooters"?

    Are folks wanting/expecting someone like Hulls where the player has one job and that is to knock down 3's at a +40% with defense, rebounding, driving the ball, etc. being optional?

    or

    Are folks wanting/expecting someone like Mark Sears that shoots +50% from the field +40% from 3, +80% from the line and can also kill you off the dribble, play D and rebound?

    or

    Are folks wanting/expecting something in between?

    I'm not making a case one way or the other for what "shooter" should mean here, I'm just trying to understand what other's are wanting/expecting.

  5. 22 minutes ago, IU Scott said:

    After the first round I was 25th and finished 5th

    My approach of picking the bracket based on how miserable I would feel with the outcome almost came back to bite me.

    Would have finished first had PU won. Ended up 22nd. I've never been happier with such a crappy finish :-).

     

  6. 48 minutes ago, OGIUAndy said:

    I do have to laugh a bit though. When we've run the "weave" or whatever you want to call it at the top of the key, everyone complains about it. UConn ran that set quite a few times in the second half. I believe Archie ran that offense more so than Woody though. IU needs athletic guards. However, if you ask me, it wasn't necessarily UConn's "modern offense" that beat PU it was their speed and athletic ability on defense that shut PU down. PU's guards were dominated defensively. 

    BINGO! IU runs that weave at the top but we don't have the guys that are both threats to drive and shoot the 3 like UConn.

    PU came out committed to keeping UConn from taking the 3 and dropping Edey to protect the paint. UConn burned them from the elbow (much like JHS did) and that opened up the paint and the 3-point line. NCState did similar but just didn't have enough guys that could make shots

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...