btownqb

Hasn't that dude been known to stir up some s*** every once in awhile? Could be wrong.

Mmmmm I think 5th?

Gawwwwd that was embarrassing playing in the first four, of our own conference tourney.

Ehh.. multi sport athlete in HS... believe he also has long arms. Those are good starting points for OTs. Wasn't he listed at 6'6 280 last year? He could be 6'6 300lbs tomorrow as well as they can put weight on those dudes. Maybe we aren't there yet... but it seems we (football in general) is favoring the 6'5-67 300-315lbs dudes that can move at tackle. I think it might also signify that we like other dudes on the interior DL... probably, namely.. Marcus Burris.

1230 ET, BH. 1130 CT

That's interesting.

Because those two teams losing was already part of the equation... it was the first part. They have to lose. Then I said "them" and I should have said "ILL and UM".

Going to get a chance... NEB got two great looks to tie it. Good game.

MSU still leading... 50 secs left 4th Q MSU has had two injuries during this game... one just got carried off... she doesn't look like she'll be able to play tomorrow.

Yes. 100%

Right. We know that. NW+Maryland losing was always a good thing for us. It's not an either or thing. I'm talking about ILL and UM. I don't really understand what is so confusing.

Them being at 9 losses means a lower seed for us. Them being at 8 losses means a higher seed for us, it's that simple.

Why wouldn't you think that game would be a factor? Every game is a factor and it's a BIG game for us.

I'm rooting for Michigan tonight because it gives us the best path possible to be a higher seed in the BTT, to make a run in the tournament, and which in return helps our ncaa seed line. ILL can go beat Purdue on Sunday, make run in the BTT themselves.. maybe they'll end up Q1 then? Idk. But yes, undoubtedly being the 2 seed is going to be easier than a 5 seed in terms of winning the BTT, of course.

If we won those 9 games... we'd be the #1 team in the country lol

I agree with a run in the tourney. Not at 22-11, though. Not once can I remember that weak of record being a 3 seed... especially not in an a non-covid ridden year.. (2020-21) WVU was 19-10 in LOADED B12... Winning our next 4 > ILL being Q1... in terms of an NCAA 3 seed.

the bold is speculation... and that's how poor our overall record and resume was last season. Maybe 98%? Maybe more like 90% and those wins we could be getting in the BTT will probably be the difference between a 3 seed and 4 seed. Depending on other results, as well. 22-11 isn't going to cut it, though. It's just not enough... for a 3 seed, that is.

That wasn't directed at you, but it's not bottom tier in regards to Indiana this season, just like last year..... win the BTT you're a 3 seed. Without the run we had last year... we aren't in.

Cannot understand the dislike for the conference tourney.

So we won't end up a 3 seed if we win out?

I don't think #2 is true... I would hope the committee would be smart enough to see that those are still good wins, and then go win 3-4 games in a row and end up 24-11 or 25-10.

If we just win Sunday, find a bye... win 2+ games in the BTT that trumps ILL moving to a Q1 win.....in regards to a 3 seed. I want that too. Heck that is 2-1 or 3-0 in neutral court games in one weekend alone. I'm rooting for Michigan tonight. I don't really see a path for ILL to end up a Q1 anyways. A win tonight won't do it, and I don't think they win Sunday.

To think it's not looked at all? of course it is.... Last years 3 seeds going into the NCAAs- Wisconsin- 24-7 Purdue- 25-9 TTU- 27-6 Tennessee 26-7

Of course it is.

haha man, I couldn't fathom us winning there last weekend, either.... so hell, F it..... Go Orange!!