kyhoosier29 Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 @Joe_Hoopsier what’s confusing? You think Tucker is the better get because this guy has him a couple spots higher? TBD is my verdict. Not sure what’s confusing about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ledies22 Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 1 hour ago, kyhoosier29 said: @Joe_Hoopsier what’s confusing? You think Tucker is the better get because this guy has him a couple spots higher? TBD is my verdict. Not sure what’s confusing about that. I think phone boy will be asked to do a lot more this year than what tucker will be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_Hoopsier Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 8 hours ago, kyhoosier29 said: @Joe_Hoopsier what’s confusing? You think Tucker is the better get because this guy has him a couple spots higher? TBD is my verdict. Not sure what’s confusing about that. I read your post as saying that you don't think we improved our roster, until Goode came on board. and maybe not even after he did. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyhoosier29 Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 4 hours ago, Joe_Hoopsier said: I read your post as saying that you don't think we improved our roster, until Goode came on board. and maybe not even after he did. No, sorry for the confusion. I was just saying prior to Goode’s addition I wouldn’t have valued Tucker as high as McNeely (and maybe still don’t). But after Goode, there could be a case for Tucker being more valuable. Just saying it’s all TBD for me based on how everything plays out. If we shoot it at a much better clip this year, then McNeely won’t be missed. If we don’t, hindsight would seem to suggest we needed McNeely more than Tucker. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.