Jump to content

Coach Mike Woodson Megathread


Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, IUFLA said:

I've said numerous times, if next year is mediocre and Dolson wants to make a change, I'd be all for it...

What if he decides this year?? I mean I don’t know either way but can only support what he does. Will you support Dolson if that is what he does? No matter what none of us have a say in the decision. I can say only for myself…I’ve seen enough to think this is not likely to get significantly better. If they make a change im ok…if it stays the same so be it…but i think Dolson is on the hot seat along with Woodson if he lets it go on longer and he knows it should be fixed. This would be his second hire he won’t get a third…same with football…you aren’t getting multiple chances at these coaching decisions…so I’m sure he will do what he thinks is best.

Edited by dgambill
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, OGIUAndy said:

I agree. And I am not sticking up for Woody. He was a reach hire to begin with (zero college experience) and most thought a stopgap. PU has had some "down" years in 2012 to 2015 and had a crap year in 2020. I am not saying Woody shouldn't be let go either, but at some point good coaches have down years, and IU has been mediocre for a long time, so it' not super surprising we're having a down year now. Woody did screw up this roster and if what you read about recruiting is true, he doesn't seem like any sort of grinder and you definitely need that nowadays. Hopefully things work out for the best regardless. 

I don't have Peegs access but apparently Rabjohns delivered a broadside on Woodson this afternoon specifically related to your last point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tdhoosier said:

Curious….if you had to put money down….knowing what you know now, do you think we make the tournament next year? 

I know you want to give him the chance to make it, which I respect, but do you think we will? 

What odds do I get? :) 

A lot of variables...Don't know who we'll have on the roster...But let's just say if we have a nucleus of Reneau, Mgbako, and Cupps, I feel good about our chances...I'll be excited to see 2 shooters like McNeely and Mgbako out there...

LOL...I burned $20 to prove the experience stuff...Hell yeah...at 10-1 I'd put $100 down ;) 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, IUCrazy2 said:

The latter 

Those people aren’t likely to change between now and the end of the year…imo we will win a game or two more and lose a couple…nothing major will happen. Either you know a change is needed or you want another year to decide. Can’t see people changing their mind at this point. There is enough evidence on both sides…he’s coached 3 years and plenty of tape…he also has 4 recruiting classes now (if Liam is all we are landing)…so while the program maybe has stabilized some is there any momentum moving it ahead? People should know where they stand on that at this point.. couple games won’t change anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, dgambill said:

What if he decides this year?? I mean I don’t know either way but can only support what he does. Will you support Dolson if that is what he does? No matter what none of us have a say in the decision. I can say only for myself…I’ve seen enough to think this is not likely to get significantly better. If they make a change im ok…if it stays the same so be it…but i think Dolson is on the hot seat along with Woodson if he lets it go on longer and he knows it should be fixed. This would be his second hire he won’t get a third…same with football…you aren’t getting multiple chances at these coaching decisions…so I’m sure he will do what he thinks is best.

I always support the program, the kids, and the coach...I didn't care for it when Sampson rolled into town with the NCAA hot on his heels, but I watched every game and rooted just as hard as I do now...

But, my initial feelings did turn out to be true...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dgambill said:

Those people aren’t likely to change between now and the end of the year…imo we will win a game or two more and lose a couple…nothing major will happen. Either you know a change is needed or you want another year to decide. Can’t see people changing their mind at this point. There is enough evidence on both sides…he’s coached 3 years and plenty of tape…he also has 4 recruiting classes now (if Liam is all we are landing)…so while the program maybe has stabilized some is there any momentum moving it ahead? People should know where they stand on that at this point.. couple games won’t change anything.

I don't disagree.  My mind is made up.  There are people who aren't though.  And some who aren't in the "we need to move on" category have some influence.

And you also have to factor in that this is just message board tea leaves reading and people tend to build their own soap operas based on the info they have.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IUProfessor said:

Depends on how you define it. If you are just looking at W/L record absent all other context, sure.

But I don't think that you could find many examples of coaches with no long-term track record of success who appear to have lost all recruiting momentum, as well as the confidence of much of the fan base, and underperformed so starkly on the court given the existing talent base, but yet were able to rebound quickly to achieve the goals that Woodson himself set (B1G and National championships). And if you could find one, they probably wouldn't have been talking as stubbornly, or running as antiquated a scheme, as Woodson is.

So the context matters. Which, again, is why the analogy of Pearl's first three years at Auburn is apples to oranges. 

@IUFLAanswer this question please. Tired of seeing you dodge it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, IUFLA said:

I have numerous times, including here

You completely dodged the question. Name the coaches without long term or previous success who have rebounded from the position that Woodson is in.

Recruiting is as stale as can be, 1 incoming recruit with 5 available scholarships open on top of being told he needs to go watch the top in-state prospects for the 2025 class.

Woodson is a dead man walking. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IndyResident16 said:

You completely dodged the question. Name the coaches without long term or previous success who have rebounded from the position that Woodson is in.

Recruiting is as stale as can be, 1 incoming recruit with 5 available scholarships open on top of being told he needs to go watch the top in-state prospects for the 2025 class.

Woodson is a dead man walking. 

I'm not going to dig through the history of college basketball coaches to satisfy you and the other "Fire Woody" posters...

But, a question, and depending on the answer, a proposal...

Are you saying Woody is gone after this season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, IndyResident16 said:

You completely dodged the question. Name the coaches without long term or previous success who have rebounded from the position that Woodson is in.

Recruiting is as stale as can be, 1 incoming recruit with 5 available scholarships open on top of being told he needs to go watch the top in-state prospects for the 2025 class.

Woodson is a dead man walking. 

Recruiting is likely not going to improve. Not many are going to commit more then 1 year to Woody when he is coaching year to year given his standing with the program. I don’t see how 25 gets better…but we shall see. I think he has a lot more support where it matters then on this board…and that’s all the matters truthfully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, IUFLA said:

I'm not going to dig through the history of college basketball coaches to satisfy you and the other "Fire Woody" posters...

But, a question, and depending on the answer, a proposal...

Are you saying Woody is gone after this season?

It's not my decision so I can't answer.

But there's zero reason to keep him employed given his failure to build a foundation as a stop gap coach. I pity whoever has to take over this mess after next year coming off a 12-13 win season in the event he is retained knowing the one recruit Woodson signed for this class is off to the NBA.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, IUFLA said:

Not "probably not." No way he would have gotten a 4th year...

And Pearl started the "turnaround" just about the time Chuck Person started handing out money...

"Despite finding Auburn guilty of the highest-level violation—a Level I-aggravated designation for its part in the bribery scandal four years ago—the Committee on Infractions accepted the school’s 2021 postseason ban and applied no additional postseason sanctions. Despite having a head coach involved in his second major infractions case in his last two jobs, Pearl is suspended a mere two games. The charges (which were hidden by the school for nearly two years when it refused to release the Notice of Allegations) were serious; the punishment was not."

Now, you can say, "well, it's all legal now." and it is...But it wasn't then, and that speak to integrity...

You realize Chuck Person wasn't handing out money, right? He also wasn't doing something illicit to bring players to Auburn. He accepted bribes to steer current players to a financial advisor/business manager. His lawyers indicated that he was in financial trouble following the end of his NBA career. 

Over the course of a year, PERSON, a former men’s basketball coach at Auburn University until shortly after his arrest, agreed to accept cash bribes in return for agreeing to exert his influence over student-athletes on the Division I men’s basketball team he coached to retain the services of the bribe-payers, including once the student-athletes entered the National Basketball Association (“NBA”).  

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/chuck-person-former-division-i-men-s-basketball-coach-pleads-guilty-bribery-manhattan

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 13th&Jackson said:

You realize Chuck Person wasn't handing out money, right? He also wasn't doing something illicit to bring players to Auburn. He accepted bribes to steer current players to a financial advisor/business manager. His lawyers indicated that he was in financial trouble following the end of his NBA career. 

Over the course of a year, PERSON, a former men’s basketball coach at Auburn University until shortly after his arrest, agreed to accept cash bribes in return for agreeing to exert his influence over student-athletes on the Division I men’s basketball team he coached to retain the services of the bribe-payers, including once the student-athletes entered the National Basketball Association (“NBA”).  

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/chuck-person-former-division-i-men-s-basketball-coach-pleads-guilty-bribery-manhattan

People like the one you are responding too have zero interest in the truth. 

Yasir Rosemond was literally involved in the same FBI probe, just didn't have the players worth bringing to the table. 

Edited by IndyResident16
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, NotIThatLives said:

What is a broadside?

I had read the same info as mentioned and summarized like this:

Skipping recruiting days over the last 3 years.

Recruits hearing from other HC more than Woodson.

Needs major help from the portal to overhaul a roster.

Choosing to pursue "ready-made" players instead of recruiting and developing HS kids

Woodson publicly stating 2 point shots are good while having one of the worst 3 point rates 3 years in a row.

HS, AAU, and other coaches/trainers have heard very little from a certain HC over the course of 3 years. 

It's March of year 3. It took until Feb. for Woodson to go see Sisley and Mullins, two of the top in-state prospects and he didn't see Mullins in a game until the sectional semifinals.

Told Boogie Fland "Boogie, again, I cannot promise you minutes because I am anticipating that Xavier Johnson may be getting a seventh year..."

I am literally just reposting what was posted on BTB and based on what Rabby has been posting. 

Edited by OGIUAndy
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 13th&Jackson said:

You realize Chuck Person wasn't handing out money, right? He also wasn't doing something illicit to bring players to Auburn. He accepted bribes to steer current players to a financial advisor/business manager. His lawyers indicated that he was in financial trouble following the end of his NBA career. 

Over the course of a year, PERSON, a former men’s basketball coach at Auburn University until shortly after his arrest, agreed to accept cash bribes in return for agreeing to exert his influence over student-athletes on the Division I men’s basketball team he coached to retain the services of the bribe-payers, including once the student-athletes entered the National Basketball Association (“NBA”).  

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/chuck-person-former-division-i-men-s-basketball-coach-pleads-guilty-bribery-manhattan

Really?

"Of the alleged $91,500 Person received during the investigation, the complaint says Person claimed to have given $11,000 of that money to the mother of the first player and an additional $7,500 to the mother of the second player." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OGIUAndy said:

I had read the same info as mentioned and summarized like this:

Skipping recruiting days over the last 3 years.

Recruits hearing from other HC more than Woodson.

Needs major help from the portal to overhaul a roster.

Choosing to pursue "ready-made" players instead of recruiting and developing HS kids

Woodson publicly stating 2 point shots are good while having one of the worst 3 point rates 3 years in a row.

HS, AAU, and other coaches/trainers have heard very little from a certain HC over the course of 3 years. 

It's March of year 3. It took until Feb. for Woodson to go see Sisley and Mullins, two of the top in-state prospects and he didn't see Mullins in a game until the sectional semifinals.

Told Boogie Fland "Boogie, again, I cannot promise you minutes because I am anticipating that Xavier Johnson may be getting a seventh year..."

I am literally just reposting what was posted on BTB and based on what Rabby has been posting. 

Pretty telling when someone like Rabjohns writes something like this given that he's a literal mouthpiece for the university. 

Most of these are fireable offenses as single instances, a culmination of them....oh my.

These reasons alone are why he shouldn't see a year 4 and notice none of them have to do with a "down" year. 

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, IUFLA said:

It was a simple question...Would ANY coach have survived with that record at IU...I think we all know the answer...

You need to watch this video then determine for yourself if Scott Dolson would trade Mike Woodson and Bruce Pearl...

I realize that this video was after Woody's first year, but "sticking with the plan" and "no timetable for success" are kinda the root of Scott Dolson as an AD...He cut his teeth under Knight, and I think he understands that every coach...Every coach, can have a year where things don't go as planned...He was a manager on the 85 team, so it's not like he's never seen IU finish under .500 in Big 10 play...

 

So you are saying Woodson is sooooooo good, 2 years from now IU wins the NCAA championship?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, IUFLA said:

Really?

"Of the alleged $91,500 Person received during the investigation, the complaint says Person claimed to have given $11,000 of that money to the mother of the first player and an additional $7,500 to the mother of the second player." 

Money to players that were CURRENTLY on Auburn's team. Chuck Person and by extension Pearl, wasn't "buying" recruits which is what you literally implied. 

Try and keep up. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, IndyResident16 said:

Pretty telling when someone like Rabjohns writes something like this given that he's a literal mouthpiece for the university. 

Most of these are fireable offenses as single instances, a culmination of them....oh my.

These reasons alone are why he shouldn't see a year 4 and notice none of them have to do with a "down" year. 

I agree and I am not a huge fan of "fire the coach" threads and hashtags, but he wasn't a great hire because of this. NBA guys don't grind like college guys do.  He's making $4 million and enjoying life more than an average college coach. It seems he is definitely blowing off recruiting. But the administration kind of has an issue.  His results have been "okay" until this year.  But he was mainly rolling with TJD in the first two years.  If he gets to 17 to 18 wins, it's going to be a tougher call than what we think.  If they have a guy lined up (like Pearl) then that is one thing.  That would be a power move.  If they do a search and come out with mediocre candidate like the guys in the running last time then we are just rolling like the Bears/IU Football.  Fire the coach every few years but never get better.

Edited by OGIUAndy
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IUFLA said:

What odds do I get? :) 

A lot of variables...Don't know who we'll have on the roster...But let's just say if we have a nucleus of Reneau, Mgbako, and Cupps, I feel good about our chances...I'll be excited to see 2 shooters like McNeely and Mgbako out there...

LOL...I burned $20 to prove the experience stuff...Hell yeah...at 10-1 I'd put $100 down ;) 

You would need 10:1 odds on us making the tournament and you think that's an argument for keeping the coach?!?

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, OGIUAndy said:

I had read the same info as mentioned and summarized like this:

Skipping recruiting days over the last 3 years.

Recruits hearing from other HC more than Woodson.

Needs major help from the portal to overhaul a roster.

Choosing to pursue "ready-made" players instead of recruiting and developing HS kids

Woodson publicly stating 2 point shots are good while having one of the worst 3 point rates 3 years in a row.

HS, AAU, and other coaches/trainers have heard very little from a certain HC over the course of 3 years. 

It's March of year 3. It took until Feb. for Woodson to go see Sisley and Mullins, two of the top in-state prospects and he didn't see Mullins in a game until the sectional semifinals.

Told Boogie Fland "Boogie, again, I cannot promise you minutes because I am anticipating that Xavier Johnson may be getting a seventh year..."

I am literally just reposting what was posted on BTB and based on what Rabby has been posting. 

The X thing cannot be true. Like I just cannot fathom that.

I don't care if the Pope grants him a 7th year he better not be at IU next year. Holy cow. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, NotIThatLives said:

What is a broadside?

Really criticized him in a way you don't normally see those guys do if they want access.  Took him to task for, in so many words, basically being kind of lazy about recruiting.  Again, that isn't first hand as I don't have the premium with Peegs but that is a Reader's Digest take on how I saw it presented.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...