Jump to content

Calipari to Arkansas?


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Indykev said:

No buyout if Cal leaves is what i've read a dozen times in the last hour. $33 mill if UK fired him. Not saying thats right, just saying.

I’m sure there is language that says if he leaves for another job that he has to pay UK. If not then that’s a horrible contract. It’s pretty standard the buyout goes both ways.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dgambill said:

I’m sure there is language that says if he leaves for another job that he has to pay UK. If not then that’s a horrible contract. It’s pretty standard the buyout goes both ways.

Not really. That’s UK’s way of saying “If you want to pay him, you can have him”. Even among the more sane folks in KY’s government, Cal’s contract ruffles more than a few feathers. He’s the highest paid state employee by a huge margin. 
 

Why ask for a buyout when you’re likely going to save money in the long run on your next coach? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hoosierfan1901 said:

It’s $0 on Coach Cal’s terms and conditions according to his contract 

Wow…what was Barnhart thinking…like 10 million a year and huge buyout to be rid of him but no protections for UK? Wow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zlinedavid said:

Not really. That’s UK’s way of saying “If you want to pay him, you can have him”. Even among the more sane folks in KY’s government, Cal’s contract ruffles more than a few feathers. He’s the highest paid state employee by a huge margin. 
 

Why ask for a buyout when you’re likely going to save money in the long run on your next coach? 

Because it’s protection from someone stealing him and gives you compensation to go after his replacement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dgambill said:

Wow…what was Barnhart thinking…like 10 million a year and huge buyout to be rid of him but no protections for UK? Wow

He’s daring another school to take Cal off of his hands, and now he doesn’t bear the risk of firing him and watching him succeed somewhere else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dgambill said:

Because it’s protection from someone stealing him and gives you compensation to go after his replacement. 

Why do you need protection when you halfway want to get rid of him anyway? 
 

Rather than fire him and be on the hook for $30M, now you can go after another coach free and clear. Even if you have to pay $25M of another coach’s buyout, you’re still $5M ahead of where you were. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zlinedavid said:

He’s dating another school to take Cal off of his hands, and now he doesn’t bear the risk of firing him and watching him succeed somewhere else. 

That was a truly awful contract that he drew up for Cal then. Should be fired for that alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zlinedavid said:

Why do you need protection when you halfway want to get rid of him anyway? 
 

Rather than fire him and be on the hook for $30M, now you can go after another coach free and clear. Even if you have to pay $25M of another coach’s buyout, you’re still $5M ahead of where you were. 

Not when he got the contact they didn’t want to be rid of him. Why sign him at all if that was the case. It was one sided contract….thats malpractice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dgambill said:

Not when he got the contact they didn’t want to be rid of him. Why sign him at all if that was the case. It was one sided contract….thats malpractice.

He’s hedging his bets.
 

Scenario 1: They don’t give him the extension, he leaves and succeeds somewhere else. Barnyard looks like an ass. 

 

Scenario 2: If he fires Cal, they pay the huge buyout, then hire a new coach after likely paying their buyout. If the new coach underperforms and/or Cal goes somewhere else, Barnyard really looks like an ass. 
 

Scenario 3, which is what happened: Someone else takes your problem off your hands. The new coach is likely to going to get less than what Cal was making initially, which means they’ll make up the difference in not having a buyout in a few years, especially since they’re not having to pay to fire Cal. 
 

He’s taking a slight loss to avoid the major loss of having to pay to buy Cal out, then pay another coach’s buyout. 
 

And I just noticed my phone autocorrected “Barnhart” to “Barnyard”, but I’m leaving it. It’s UK, so it kind of fits. 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Zlinedavid said:

It’s rare for a coach to jump from one blue blood to another. Out of the historic powers, there’s only been one coach to coach at more than one: Larry Brown, UCLA and Kansas. 

Is that you Roy Williams?  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...