Jump to content

kyhoosier29

Members
  • Posts

    3,283
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kyhoosier29

  1. Didnā€™t see many complaints about officiating last night. Were we that bad they werenā€™t noticed? šŸ˜‚
  2. He said ā€œnut tapā€. šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚ And Iā€™m laughing uncontrollably about him ā€œwiping the guys ass from the frontā€. Appreciate the laugh!
  3. Dane Fifeā€¦. šŸ¤·šŸ»ā€ā™‚ļø. And I know nothing of what happened with him, but maybe he was too much of the opposite and maybe knew a little more about everything than we want to give him credit.
  4. Weā€™ll beat Minnesota. Then weā€™ll play a Kansas type game against Purdue but still lose. After that Wisconsin and Illinois will both beat us by 20.
  5. Iā€™m not sure how much I care about either to be honest. Hate to sound crazy, but Ware has zero fire and MR might as well just stand on the offensive end the whole time heā€™s in the game. He doesnā€™t rebound or play much D typically. Mgbako? Good lord. Weā€™re hurtingā€¦..
  6. Thereā€™s A LOT that needs to change from a personnel perspective if weā€™re going to be any better next year. But good thing Woody knows more than the rest of us and can handle it. Maybe heā€™s still in the testing phase and will start coaching for real here soon.
  7. Not sure why anybody would be surprised with that game. 4-15 FT šŸ˜‚ 19 OR given up 18 Turnovers Terrible substitutions Dumb player decisions Just a complete shit show, but what I expected.
  8. You mean the guy that hit the backboard on the previous FT? Because if the same guy (thought it was), then hell yeah foul him again. Disagree.
  9. Canā€™t grab somebody from behind like that? Intentional, non-basketball play. No argument here.
  10. Dumbest flipping team ever. First off, the guy with the ball just hit the backboard on a FT and we donā€™t foul him again immediately. Then we grab him from behind for an intentional foul. You just canā€™t make this stuff up.
  11. Rutgers took OSU to the wire in Columbusā€¦.. so, Iā€™m not very confident this goes well tonight. šŸ¤·šŸ»ā€ā™‚ļø
  12. Obvious that we have a lot of work to be done.
  13. Not surprised in the least that Michigan lost at PSU. It wonā€™t be an easy or sure task for us either. Reality.
  14. Yeah, I mean understand the term šŸ˜‚, but given performances, metrics, likelihood of quality wins, we REALLY need this one. We can keep kicking the bucket down the road and saying, ā€œwell we can upset such and such, or maybe we can win out, or maybe we can win the Big10 tournamentā€ but I think we all know thatā€™s a long shot. Need to win games like this.
  15. I donā€™t think the team thinks that itā€™s a must win unfortunately.
  16. Took care of business somehowā€¦.. rebounding was dreadful/unacceptable and perimeter D still isnā€™t good. They missed a lot of open opportunities. Anybody is welcome to contribute that partly to D if youā€™d like, but I think we just finally caught some luck with a team that had an off night from the perimeter. But Iā€™ll take it. (Did do a better job against Battle in the second half). Need and deserve that sometimes. I predicted a win at home (the key), but given the two shortcomings above (OR might as well be turnovers) I donā€™t have much confidence for Tuesday. Need X to play to that level consistently if we want to have a shot moving forward. CJ deserves props. Hope that confidence continues to evolve. MR, as others have said, was huge on the offensive end. Could be crazy good if he played with the same effort on D and getting boards. Glad for the win, but donā€™t think it changes my outlook much, other than a slight bit of confidence that X still has it and Gunn MIGHT be able to evolve into an asset.
  17. X with Gunn a close second for me. Canā€™t vote for MR the way him and Ware got abused on the boards.
  18. Iā€™d say we have much higher standards? Or are we content looking up to Purdue?
  19. We arenā€™t beating Rutgers on the road.
  20. šŸ‘. Iā€™m not arguing about Archie Millerā€¦. or the mediocre players he inherited (which werenā€™t good enough for IU), but youā€™re welcome to believe otherwise. He needed to go when he did and so will Woodson in a couple years if things donā€™t improve much.
  21. Youā€™re stretching big time if youā€™re wanting to make the case that he inherited much. Come on, some just like to bash CAM bc itā€™s easy. Yeah, he needed to go, but be honest at least. Justin Smith was mediocre in all facets, and wasnā€™t productive until his very last year (benefitted from being on a good team). So inheriting Morgan, Smith (in your words), and a serviceable guard should have been enough to winā€¦ 3 on 5 is a tough task. I didnā€™t say anything about what Woodson inherited, just think people piling on CAM is ridiculous. Weā€™re past his shortcomings. No excuse for Woodson at this point.
  22. Juwan and who else since ā€œhe absolutely did not take over a dumpster fireā€? Priller šŸ˜‚ Hartman - meh V. Blackman šŸ˜‚ Clifton Moore šŸ˜‚ Freddie McSwain šŸ„“ Deā€™Ron Davis šŸ„“ Zach McRoberts šŸ„“ Devontae Green šŸ¤® Robert Johnson āœ… Justin Smith šŸ„“ Al Durham šŸ„“ Josh Newkirk šŸ˜‚ Iā€™d love to hear your spinā€¦.
  23. Pretty sure the efficiency metrics were improving year over year with Archie until the last half of his last year. I know people just want to crap on him as much as possible, but ā€¦. šŸ¤·šŸ»ā€ā™‚ļø Correct me if Iā€™m wrong. I disagree that he didnā€™t take over a dumpster fireā€¦. Crean left very little in the cupboard.
×
×
  • Create New...