Jump to content

USC and UCLA to the Big Ten ?


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, IU Scott said:

They think this is what fans want to see

No, they think that's what the accountants want to see...

Money is always gonna carry the day... Those who don't want to contribute can stop going/watching... There are enough who will still watch/go... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, IUFLA said:

No, they think that's what the accountants want to see...

Money is always gonna carry the day... Those who don't want to contribute can stop going/watching... There are enough who will still watch/go... 

Love of money ruins everything.  

It's pretty much destroyed all sides of my family/families 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now its $70 Million a year for current schools. Washington and Oregon will get $35 million a year to join with that increasing yearly. It will grow to $100 million per school before long. Yes its about the money. Its not cheap to run college athletic Departments. When most sports run in the RED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2023 at 4:48 PM, Steubenhoosier said:

I envision that when APRs start to plummet due to athletes being out of the classroom due to excessive travel time that the sham that is being positioned as the “student athlete “ will no longer exist. I can see multiple teams becoming ineligible for tournament play due to not meeting the grade requirements. That will end when it happens the first time and players will become employees who have the option of going to class or not.

The only logical solution to this concern is to expedite the addition of UNC to the B1G. We can then tap into their extensive knowledge base and expertise in making the problems all go away. 🤓

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Madison22 said:

 From CBS:  "It's not immediately clear what the future holds for the Pac-12 conference with just four remaining members."

Hahaha, someone has already launched pac-4.com.

image.png.e171d21751394af466a96303c782670c.png

 

 

"Well, we're just gonna go with the Pac 4... We'll play each other 3 times, then the top 2 will play in a championship game in Walla Walla." 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IUFLA said:

"Well, we're just gonna go with the Pac 4... We'll play each other 3 times, then the top 2 will play in a championship game in Walla Walla." 

I suppose they would join the Mountain West. At least Oregon st and Wash St. Stanford and Cal may go independent. Suppose they could try to get a streaming deal with Apple or Amazon but holy cow they are going from 30 million a year tv deals to probably 5 million. Imagine they try to go crawling to B1G 12 too at a limited share. Gotta be a better addition than Cincinnati lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Zuckerkorn said:

He's not wrong....

No he isn't.  And the minute these schools have to do a revenue share is the minute this all comes crashing down.  Get your facility upgrades in before revenue sharing starts because you won't have that much opportunity after the fact.  The vast majority of schools lose money in athletics.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, IUCrazy2 said:

No he isn't.  And the minute these schools have to do a revenue share is the minute this all comes crashing down.  Get your facility upgrades in before revenue sharing starts because you won't have that much opportunity after the fact.  The vast majority of schools lose money in athletics.

revenue share... hopefully they take part in the losses (risk) too?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting piece on how expansion will affect hoops scheduling. The consensus seems to be the conference will have to expand the league schedule to 22-24 games, perhaps extending into November, with most schools then easing up on the non-conference schedule accordingly. Each team likely to make a two-game trip to Washington/Oregon or UCLA/USC annually.

https://theathletic.com/4754176/2023/08/07/big-ten-basketball-expansion-coaches/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rico said:

Thought I would put this here.  Michigan regent gets honest:

https://sports.yahoo.com/university-michigan-regent-gives-brutally-015556399.html

Wait until a school like Ohio St says we don't think schools like Rutgers or Maryland or Northwestern should get the same $ as us in football. 

You'll end up having tiers within your own conference. One for football, one for basketball,etc....haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, ledies22 said:

revenue share... hopefully they take part in the losses (risk) too?

For all but a handful of schools it is almost all risk.  They can do revenue share but if they do, then the days of "I have to have a multimillion dollar locker room, weight room, and separate practice facility that gets upgraded every 7 to 10 years" are over.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Seeking6 said:

Wait until a school like Ohio St says we don't think schools like Rutgers or Maryland or Northwestern should get the same $ as us in football. 

You'll end up having tiers within your own conference. One for football, one for basketball,etc....haha

https://www.on3.com/news/usa-today-releases-top-25-total-revenue-college-athletics-programs/

Look at #13....maybe we aren't as bad off as we think.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rico said:

Thought I would put this here.  Michigan regent gets honest:

https://sports.yahoo.com/university-michigan-regent-gives-brutally-015556399.html

Could not agree more 

Purdue & IU are here to educate our kids and do research 

these schools drool 🤤 over piles of cash 💰….not to pay the talent but rebuild locker rooms & recruiting shrines 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bluegrassIU said:

Hard to argue with a single point. Very direct critique. 

Except the fact that the NCAA is, and has been for some time, a toothless tiger...

There's no way they could rein in the school presidents and the conference commisioners without losing everything...Between those people and individual states wanting to make their own rules, I don't think yuou can point to the NCAA with a straight face and say they are the main reason it's such a mess...

Edited by IUFLA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...